Back to Search Start Over

Maintenance treatment with rucaparib for recurrent ovarian carcinoma in ARIEL3, a randomized phase 3 trial: The effects of best response to last platinum-based regimen and disease at baseline on efficacy and safety.

Authors :
Oaknin A
Oza AM
Lorusso D
Aghajanian C
Dean A
Colombo N
Weberpals JI
Clamp AR
Scambia G
Leary A
Holloway RW
Amenedo Gancedo M
Fong PC
Goh JC
O'Malley DM
Armstrong DK
Banerjee S
García-Donas J
Swisher EM
Cameron T
Maloney L
Goble S
Ledermann JA
Coleman RL
Source :
Cancer medicine [Cancer Med] 2021 Oct; Vol. 10 (20), pp. 7162-7173. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Sep 21.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and safety of rucaparib maintenance treatment in ARIEL3 were evaluated in subgroups based on best response to most recent platinum-based chemotherapy and baseline disease.<br />Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either oral rucaparib at a dosage of 600 mg twice daily or placebo. Investigator-assessed PFS was assessed in prespecified, nested cohorts: BRCA-mutated, homologous recombination deficient (HRD; BRCA mutated or wild-type BRCA/high loss of heterozygosity), and the intent-to-treat (ITT) population.<br />Results: Median PFS for patients in the ITT population with a complete response to most recent platinum-based chemotherapy was 11.1 months in the rucaparib arm (126 patients) versus 5.6 months in the placebo arm (64 patients) (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.23-0.48]), and in patients with a partial response (249 vs. 125), it was 9.0 versus 5.3 months (HR, 0.38 [0.30-0.49]). In subgroups of the ITT population based on baseline disease, median PFS was 8.2 versus 5.3 months (HR, 0.40 [0.28-0.57]) in patients with measurable disease (141 rucaparib vs. 66 placebo), 10.4 versus 4.5 months (HR, 0.31 [0.20-0.48]) in those with nonmeasurable but evaluable disease (104 vs. 56), and 14.1 versus 7.3 months (HR, 0.35 [0.24-0.51]) in those with no residual disease (130 vs. 67). Across subgroups, significantly longer median PFS was observed with rucaparib versus placebo in the BRCA-mutated and HRD cohorts. Objective responses were reported in patients with measurable disease and in patients with nonmeasurable but evaluable baseline disease. Safety was consistent across subgroups.<br />Conclusion: Rucaparib maintenance treatment provided clinically meaningful efficacy benefits across subgroups based on response to last platinum-based chemotherapy or baseline disease.<br /> (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2045-7634
Volume :
10
Issue :
20
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cancer medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34549539
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4260