Back to Search Start Over

Cancer-specific survival after radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy in high-risk and very high-risk African American prostate cancer patients.

Authors :
Hoeh B
Würnschimmel C
Flammia RS
Horlemann B
Sorce G
Chierigo F
Tian Z
Saad F
Graefen M
Gallucci M
Briganti A
Terrone C
Shariat SF
Kluth LA
Mandel P
Chun FKH
Karakiewicz PI
Source :
The Prostate [Prostate] 2022 Jan; Vol. 82 (1), pp. 120-131. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 18.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: To test for differences in cancer-specific mortality (CSM) rates between radical prostatectomy (RP) vs external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high-risk African American patients, as well as Johns Hopkins University (JHU) high-risk and very high-risk patients.<br />Materials and Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2016), we identified 4165 NCCN high-risk patients, of whom 1944 (46.7%) and 2221 (53.3%) patients qualified for JHU high-risk or very high-risk definitions. Of all 4165 patients, 1390 (33.5%) were treated with RP versus 2775 (66.6%) with EBRT. Cumulative incidence plots and competing risks regression models addressed CSM before and after 1:1 propensity score matching between RP and EBRT NCCN high-risk patients. Subsequently, analyses were repeated separately in JHU high-risk and very high-risk subgroups. Finally, all analyses were repeated after landmark analyses were applied.<br />Results: In the NCCN high-risk cohort, 5-year CSM rates for RP versus EBRT were 2.4 versus 5.2%, yielding a multivariable hazard ratio of 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.84, p = 0.009) favoring RP. In JHU very high-risk patients 5-year CSM rates for RP versus EBRT were 3.7 versus 8.4%, respectively, yielding a multivariable hazard ratio of 0.51 (95% CI: 0.28-0.95, p = 0.03) favoring RP. Conversely, in JHU high-risk patients, no significant CSM difference was recorded between RP vs EBRT (5-year CSM rates: 1.3 vs 1.3%; multivariable hazard ratio: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.16-1.90, p = 0.3). Observations were confirmed in propensity score-matched and landmark analyses adjusted cohorts.<br />Conclusions: In JHU very high-risk African American patients, RP may hold a CSM advantage over EBRT, but not in JHU high-risk African American patients.<br /> (© 2021 The Authors. The Prostate published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-0045
Volume :
82
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Prostate
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34662443
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24253