Back to Search Start Over

An external validation of a novel predictive algorithm for male nipple areolar positioning: an improvement to current practice through a multicenter endeavor.

Authors :
Timmermans FW
Ruyssinck L
Mokken SE
Buncamper M
Veen KM
Mullender MG
Claes KEY
Bouman MB
Monstrey S
van de Grift TC
Source :
Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery [J Plast Surg Hand Surg] 2023 Feb-Dec; Vol. 57 (1-6), pp. 103-108. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Nov 07.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

The correct positioning of nipple-areolar complexes (NAC) during gender-affirming mastectomies remains a particular challenge. Recently, a Dutch two-step algorithm was proposed predicting the most ideal NAC-position derived from a large cisgender male cohort. We aimed to externally validate this algorithm in a Belgian cohort. The Belgian validation cohort consisted of cisgender men. Based on patient-specific anthropometry, the algorithm predicts nipple-nipple distance (NN) and sternal-notch-to-nipple distance (SNN). Predictions were externally validated using the performance measures: R <superscript>2</superscript> -value, means squared error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). Additionally, data were collected from a Belgian and Dutch cohort of transgender men having undergone mastectomy with free nipple grafts. The observed and predicted NN and SNN were compared and the inter-center variability was assessed. A total of 51 Belgian cisgender and 25 transgender men were included, as well as 150 Dutch cisgender and 96 transgender men. Respectively, the performance measures ( R <superscript>2</superscript> -value, MSE and MAPE) for NN were 0.315, 2.35 (95%CI:0-6.9), 4.9% (95%CI:3.8-6.1) and 0.423, 1.51 (95%CI:0-4.02), 4.73%(95%CI:3.7-5.7) for SNN. When applying the algorithm to both transgender cohorts, the predicted SNN was larger in both Dutch (17.1 <subscript>measured</subscript> ( ± 1.7) vs. 18.7 <subscript>predicted</subscript> ( ± 1.4), p= <0.001) and Belgian (16.2 <subscript>measured</subscript> ( ± 1.8) vs. 18.4 <subscript>predicted</subscript> ( ± 1.5), p = <0.001) cohorts, whereas NN was too long in the Belgian (22.0 <subscript>measured</subscript> ( ± 2.6) vs. 21.2 <subscript>predicted</subscript> ( ± 1.6), p  = 0.025) and too short in the Dutch cohort (19.8 <subscript>measured</subscript> ( ± 1.8) vs. 20.7 <subscript>predicted</subscript> ( ± 1.9), p  = 0.001). Both models performed well in external validation. This indicates that this two-step algorithm provides a reproducible and accurate clinical tool in determining the most ideal patient-tailored NAC-position in transgender men seeking gender-affirming chest surgery.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2000-6764
Volume :
57
Issue :
1-6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34743656
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2021.1994982