Back to Search Start Over

A Randomized Trial of Intravenous Alteplase before Endovascular Treatment for Stroke.

Authors :
LeCouffe NE
Kappelhof M
Treurniet KM
Rinkel LA
Bruggeman AE
Berkhemer OA
Wolff L
van Voorst H
Tolhuisen ML
Dippel DWJ
van der Lugt A
van Es ACGM
Boiten J
Lycklama À Nijeholt GJ
Keizer K
Gons RAR
Yo LSF
van Oostenbrugge RJ
van Zwam WH
Roozenbeek B
van der Worp HB
Lo RTH
van den Wijngaard IR
de Ridder IR
Costalat V
Arquizan C
Lemmens R
Demeestere J
Hofmeijer J
Martens JM
Schonewille WJ
Vos JA
Uyttenboogaart M
Bokkers RPH
van Tuijl JH
Kortman H
Schreuder FHBM
Boogaarts HD
de Laat KF
van Dijk LC
den Hertog HM
van Hasselt BAAM
Brouwers PJAM
Bulut T
Remmers MJM
van Norden A
Imani F
Rozeman AD
Elgersma OEH
Desfontaines P
Brisbois D
Samson Y
Clarençon F
Krietemeijer GM
Postma AA
van Doormaal PJ
van den Berg R
van der Hoorn A
Beenen LFM
Nieboer D
Lingsma HF
Emmer BJ
Coutinho JM
Majoie CBLM
Roos YBWEM
Source :
The New England journal of medicine [N Engl J Med] 2021 Nov 11; Vol. 385 (20), pp. 1833-1844.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: The value of administering intravenous alteplase before endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke has not been studied extensively, particularly in non-Asian populations.<br />Methods: We performed an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial in Europe involving patients with stroke who presented directly to a hospital that was capable of providing EVT and who were eligible for intravenous alteplase and EVT. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive EVT alone or intravenous alteplase followed by EVT (the standard of care). The primary end point was functional outcome on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 [no disability] to 6 [death]) at 90 days. We assessed the superiority of EVT alone over alteplase plus EVT, as well as noninferiority by a margin of 0.8 for the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the odds ratio of the two trial groups. Death from any cause and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage were the main safety end points.<br />Results: The analysis included 539 patients. The median score on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days was 3 (interquartile range, 2 to 5) with EVT alone and 2 (interquartile range, 2 to 5) with alteplase plus EVT. The adjusted common odds ratio was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 1.15; P = 0.28), which showed neither superiority nor noninferiority of EVT alone. Mortality was 20.5% with EVT alone and 15.8% with alteplase plus EVT (adjusted odds ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.84 to 2.30). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 5.9% and 5.3% of the patients in the respective groups (adjusted odds ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.60 to 2.81).<br />Conclusions: In a randomized trial involving European patients, EVT alone was neither superior nor noninferior to intravenous alteplase followed by EVT with regard to disability outcome at 90 days after stroke. The incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was similar in the two groups. (Funded by the Collaboration for New Treatments of Acute Stroke consortium and others; MR CLEAN-NO IV ISRCTN number, ISRCTN80619088.).<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1533-4406
Volume :
385
Issue :
20
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The New England journal of medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34758251
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2107727