Back to Search Start Over

Multi-Institutional Validation of a Mammography-Based Breast Cancer Risk Model.

Authors :
Yala A
Mikhael PG
Strand F
Lin G
Satuluru S
Kim T
Banerjee I
Gichoya J
Trivedi H
Lehman CD
Hughes K
Sheedy DJ
Matthis LM
Karunakaran B
Hegarty KE
Sabino S
Silva TB
Evangelista MC
Caron RF
Souza B
Mauad EC
Patalon T
Handelman-Gotlib S
Guindy M
Barzilay R
Source :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [J Clin Oncol] 2022 Jun 01; Vol. 40 (16), pp. 1732-1740. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Nov 12.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Purpose: Accurate risk assessment is essential for the success of population screening programs in breast cancer. Models with high sensitivity and specificity would enable programs to target more elaborate screening efforts to high-risk populations, while minimizing overtreatment for the rest. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based risk models have demonstrated a significant advance over risk models used today in clinical practice. However, the responsible deployment of novel AI requires careful validation across diverse populations. To this end, we validate our AI-based model, Mirai, across globally diverse screening populations.<br />Methods: We collected screening mammograms and pathology-confirmed breast cancer outcomes from Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Novant, USA; Emory, USA; Maccabi-Assuta, Israel; Karolinska, Sweden; Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan; and Barretos, Brazil. We evaluated Uno's concordance index for Mirai in predicting risk of breast cancer at one to five years from the mammogram.<br />Results: A total of 128,793 mammograms from 62,185 patients were collected across the seven sites, of which 3,815 were followed by a cancer diagnosis within 5 years. Mirai obtained concordance indices of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.78), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.80), 0.77 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.79), 0.77 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.81), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.82), 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.83), and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.88) at Massachusetts General Hospital, Novant, Emory, Maccabi-Assuta, Karolinska, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and Barretos, respectively.<br />Conclusion: Mirai, a mammography-based risk model, maintained its accuracy across globally diverse test sets from seven hospitals across five countries. This is the broadest validation to date of an AI-based breast cancer model and suggests that the technology can offer broad and equitable improvements in care.<br />Competing Interests: Adam YalaHonoraria: SanofiConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen Research & Development Peter G. MikhaelConsulting or Advisory Role: Outcomes4Me Fredrik StrandHonoraria: LunitUncompensated Relationships: Lunit Gigin LinResearch Funding: Quanta Computer (Inst) Siddharth SatuluruEmployment: Amerimed EMSStock and Other Ownership Interests: Sorrento Therapeutics (I), Moderna Therapeutics (I) Constance D. LehmanHonoraria: GE HealthcareConsulting or Advisory Role: GE Healthcare, Clairity, IncResearch Funding: GE Healthcare, HologicTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Clairity, IncOther Relationship: Clairity, Inc Kevin HughesStock and Other Ownership Interests: CRA HealthHonoraria: Hologic, Myriad GeneticsConsulting or Advisory Role: Targeted Medical Education, Inc, MedNeon,Other Relationship: Ask2Me.Org Regina BarzilayConsulting or Advisory Role: J&J, Bayer, Moderna Therapeutics, Amgen, VertexResearch Funding: BayerTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: J&J, Bayer, Novo NordiskNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1527-7755
Volume :
40
Issue :
16
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34767469
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01337