Back to Search Start Over

The Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on Time to Primary, Secondary Resection and Adjuvant Intravesical Therapy in Patients with High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Cohort Analysis.

Authors :
Ferro M
Del Giudice F
Carrieri G
Busetto GM
Cormio L
Hurle R
Contieri R
Arcaniolo D
Sciarra A
Maggi M
Porpiglia F
Manfredi M
Fiori C
Antonelli A
Tafuri A
Bove P
Terrone C
Borghesi M
Costantini E
Iliano E
Montanari E
Boeri L
Russo GI
Madonia M
Tedde A
Veccia A
Simeone C
Liguori G
Trombetta C
Brunocilla E
Schiavina R
Dal Moro F
Racioppi M
Vartolomei MD
Longo N
Spirito L
Crocetto F
Cantiello F
Damiano R
Di Stasi SM
Marchioni M
Schips L
Parma P
Carmignani L
Conti A
Soria F
Gontero P
Barone B
Deho F
Zaffuto E
Papalia R
Scarpa RM
Pagliarulo V
Lucarelli G
Ditonno P
Botticelli FMG
Musi G
Catellani M
de Cobelli O
Source :
Cancers [Cancers (Basel)] 2021 Oct 21; Vol. 13 (21). Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Oct 21.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: To investigate the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on the diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).<br />Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using an Italian multi-institutional database of TURBT patients with high-risk urothelial NMIBC between January 2019 and February 2021, followed by Re-TURBT and/or adjuvant intravesical BCG.<br />Results: A total of 2591 patients from 27 institutions with primary TURBT were included. Of these, 1534 (59.2%) and 1056 (40.8%) underwent TURBT before and during the COVID-19 outbreak, respectively. Time between diagnosis and TURBT was significantly longer during the COVID-19 period (65 vs. 52 days, p = 0.002). One thousand and sixty-six patients (41.1%) received Re-TURBT, 604 (56.7%) during the pre-COVID-19. The median time to secondary resection was significantly longer during the COVID-19 period (55 vs. 48 days, p < 0.0001). A total of 977 patients underwent adjuvant intravesical therapy after primary or secondary resection, with a similar distribution across the two groups ( n = 453, 86% vs. n = 388, 86.2%). However, the proportion of the patients who underwent maintenance significantly differed (79.5% vs. 60.4%, p < 0.0001).<br />Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic represented an unprecedented challenge to our health system. Our study did not show significant differences in TURBT quality. However, a delay in treatment schedule and disease management was observed. Investigation of the oncological impacts of those differences should be advocated.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2072-6694
Volume :
13
Issue :
21
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cancers
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34771440
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13215276