Back to Search
Start Over
Operating procedures, risk management and challenges during implementation of adaptive and non-adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy: 1-year single-center experience.
- Source :
-
Radiation oncology (London, England) [Radiat Oncol] 2021 Nov 14; Vol. 16 (1), pp. 217. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Nov 14. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Background: Main purpose was to describe procedures and identify challenges in the implementation process of adaptive and non-adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT), especially new risks in workflow due to the new technique. We herein report the single center experience for the implementation of (MRgRT) and present an overview on our treatment practice.<br />Methods: Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinical and technical characteristics of treatment and patient characteristics including sites treated between April 2019 and end of March 2020 after ethical approval. A risk analysis was performed to identify risks of the online adaptive workflow.<br />Results: A summary of the processes on the MR-Linac including workflows, quality assurance and possible pitfalls is presented. 111 patients with 124 courses were treated during the first year of MR-guided radiotherapy. The most commonly treated site was the abdomen (42% of all treatment courses). 73% of the courses were daily online adapted and a high number of treatment courses (75%) were treated with stereotactic body irradiation. Only 4/382 fractions could not be treated due to a failing online adaptive quality assurance. In the risk analysis for errors, the two risks with the highest risk priority number were both in the contouring category, making it the most critical step in the workflow.<br />Conclusion: Although challenging, establishment of MRgRT as a routinely used technique at our department was successful for all sites and daily o-ART was feasible from the first day on. However, ongoing research and reports will have to inform us on the optimal indications for MRgRT because careful patient selection is necessary as it continues to be a time-consuming treatment technique with restricted availability. After risk analysis, the most critical workflow category was the contouring process, which resembles the need of experienced staff and safety check paths.<br /> (© 2021. The Author(s).)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Combined Modality Therapy
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms radiotherapy
Neoplasms surgery
Organs at Risk radiation effects
Prognosis
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated methods
Re-Irradiation
Retrospective Studies
Risk Management
Health Plan Implementation
Neoplasms pathology
Patient Selection
Quality Assurance, Health Care standards
Radiosurgery methods
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1748-717X
- Volume :
- 16
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Radiation oncology (London, England)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 34775998
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01945-9