Back to Search Start Over

Novel Analysis to Quantify Plume Crosswind Heterogeneity Applied to Biomass Burning Smoke.

Authors :
Decker ZCJ
Wang S
Bourgeois I
Campuzano Jost P
Coggon MM
DiGangi JP
Diskin GS
Flocke FM
Franchin A
Fredrickson CD
Gkatzelis GI
Hall SR
Halliday H
Hayden K
Holmes CD
Huey LG
Jimenez JL
Lee YR
Lindaas J
Middlebrook AM
Montzka DD
Neuman JA
Nowak JB
Pagonis D
Palm BB
Peischl J
Piel F
Rickly PS
Robinson MA
Rollins AW
Ryerson TB
Sekimoto K
Thornton JA
Tyndall GS
Ullmann K
Veres PR
Warneke C
Washenfelder RA
Weinheimer AJ
Wisthaler A
Womack C
Brown SS
Source :
Environmental science & technology [Environ Sci Technol] 2021 Dec 07; Vol. 55 (23), pp. 15646-15657. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Nov 24.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

We present a novel method, the Gaussian observational model for edge to center heterogeneity (GOMECH), to quantify the horizontal chemical structure of plumes. GOMECH fits observations of short-lived emissions or products against a long-lived tracer (e.g., CO) to provide relative metrics for the plume width ( w <subscript> i </subscript> / w <subscript>CO</subscript> ) and center ( b <subscript> i </subscript> / w <subscript>CO</subscript> ). To validate GOMECH, we investigate OH and NO <subscript>3</subscript> oxidation processes in smoke plumes sampled during FIREX-AQ (Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality, a 2019 wildfire smoke study). An analysis of 430 crosswind transects demonstrates that nitrous acid (HONO), a primary source of OH, is narrower than CO ( w <subscript>HONO</subscript> / w <subscript>CO</subscript> = 0.73-0.84 ± 0.01) and maleic anhydride (an OH oxidation product) is enhanced on plume edges ( w <subscript>maleicanhydride</subscript> / w <subscript>CO</subscript> = 1.06-1.12 ± 0.01). By contrast, NO <subscript>3</subscript> production [P(NO <subscript>3</subscript> )] occurs mainly at the plume center ( w <subscript>P(NO <subscript>3</subscript> )</subscript> / w <subscript>CO</subscript> = 0.91-1.00 ± 0.01). Phenolic emissions, highly reactive to OH and NO <subscript>3</subscript> , are narrower than CO ( w <subscript>phenol</subscript> / w <subscript>CO</subscript> = 0.96 ± 0.03, w <subscript>catechol</subscript> / w <subscript>CO</subscript> = 0.91 ± 0.01, and w <subscript>methylcatechol</subscript> / w <subscript>CO</subscript> = 0.84 ± 0.01), suggesting that plume edge phenolic losses are the greatest. Yet, nitrophenolic aerosol, their oxidation product, is the greatest at the plume center ( w <subscript>nitrophenolicaerosol</subscript> / w <subscript>CO</subscript> = 0.95 ± 0.02). In a large plume case study, GOMECH suggests that nitrocatechol aerosol is most associated with P(NO <subscript>3</subscript> ). Last, we corroborate GOMECH with a large eddy simulation model which suggests most (55%) of nitrocatechol is produced through NO <subscript>3</subscript> in our case study.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1520-5851
Volume :
55
Issue :
23
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Environmental science & technology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34817984
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03803