Back to Search Start Over

CT-guided versus MR-guided radiotherapy: Impact on gastrointestinal sparing in adrenal stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Authors :
Rodriguez LL
Kotecha R
Tom MC
Chuong MD
Contreras JA
Romaguera T
Alvarez D
McCulloch J
Herrera R
Hernandez RJ
Mercado J
Mehta MP
Gutierrez AN
Mittauer KE
Source :
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology [Radiother Oncol] 2022 Jan; Vol. 166, pp. 101-109. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Nov 26.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background and Purpose: To quantify the indication for adaptive, gated breath-hold (BH) MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT <subscript>BH</subscript> ) versus BH or free-breathing (FB) CT-based image-guided radiotherapy (CT-IGRT) for the ablative treatment of adrenal malignancies.<br />Materials and Methods: Twenty adrenal patients underwent adaptive IMRT MRgRT <subscript>BH</subscript> to a median dose of 50 Gy/5 fractions. Each patient was replanned for VMAT CT-IGRT <subscript>BH</subscript> and CT-IGRT <subscript>FB</subscript> on a c-arm linac. Only CT-IGRT <subscript>FB</subscript> used an ITV, summed from GTVs of all phases of the 4DCT respiratory evaluation. All used the same 5 mm GTV/ITV to PTV expansion. Metrics evaluated included: target volume and coverage, conformality, mean ipsilateral kidney and 0.5 cc gastrointestinal organ-at-risk (OAR) doses (D <subscript>0.5cc</subscript> ). Adaptive dose for MRgRT <subscript>BH</subscript> and predicted dose (i.e., initial plan re-calculated on anatomy of the day) was performed for CT-IGRT <subscript>BH</subscript> and MRgRT <subscript>BH</subscript> to assess frequency of OAR violations and coverage reductions for each fraction.<br />Results: The more common VMAT CT-IGRT <subscript>FB</subscript> , with its significantly larger target volumes, proved inferior to MRgRT <subscript>BH</subscript> in mean PTV and ITV/GTV coverage, as well as small bowel D <subscript>0.5cc</subscript> . Conversely, VMAT CT-IGRT <subscript>BH</subscript> delivered a dosimetrically superior initial plan in terms of statistically significant (p ≤ 0.02) improvements in target coverage, conformality and D <subscript>0.5cc</subscript> to the large bowel, duodenum and mean ipsilateral kidney compared to IMRT MRgRT <subscript>BH</subscript> . However, non-adaptive CT-IGRT <subscript>BH</subscript> had a 71.8% frequency of predicted indications for adaptation and was 2.8 times more likely to experience a coverage reduction in PTV D <subscript>95%</subscript> than predicted for MRgRT <subscript>BH</subscript> .<br />Conclusion: Breath-hold VMAT radiotherapy provides superior target coverage and conformality over MRgRT <subscript>BH</subscript> , but the ability of MRgRT <subscript>BH</subscript> to safely provide ablative doses to adrenal lesions near mobile luminal OAR through adaptation and direct, real-time motion tracking is unmatched.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-0887
Volume :
166
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34843842
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.024