Back to Search Start Over

Probabilistic microsimulation to examine the cost-effectiveness of hospital admission screening strategies for carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in the United Kingdom.

Authors :
Manoukian S
Stewart S
Dancer SJ
Mason H
Graves N
Robertson C
Leonard A
Kennedy S
Kavanagh K
Parcell B
Reilly J
Source :
The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care [Eur J Health Econ] 2022 Sep; Vol. 23 (7), pp. 1173-1185. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Dec 21.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance has been recognised as a global threat with carbapenemase- producing-Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) as a prime example. CPE has similarities to COVID-19 where asymptomatic patients may be colonised representing a source for onward transmission. There are limited treatment options for CPE infection leading to poor outcomes and increased costs. Admission screening can prevent cross-transmission by pre-emptively isolating colonised patients.<br />Objective: We assess the relative cost-effectiveness of screening programmes compared with no- screening.<br />Methods: A microsimulation parameterised with NHS Scotland date was used to model scenarios of the prevalence of CPE colonised patients on admission. Screening strategies were (a) two-step screening involving a clinical risk assessment (CRA) checklist followed by microbiological testing of high-risk patients; and (b) universal screening. Strategies were considered with either culture or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests. All costs were reported in 2019 UK pounds with a healthcare system perspective.<br />Results: In the low prevalence scenario, no screening had the highest probability of cost-effectiveness. Among screening strategies, the two CRA screening options were the most likely to be cost-effective. Screening was more likely to be cost-effective than no screening in the prevalence of 1 CPE colonised in 500 admitted patients or more. There was substantial uncertainty with the probabilities rarely exceeding 40% and similar results between strategies. Screening reduced non-isolated bed-days and CPE colonisation. The cost of screening was low in relation to total costs.<br />Conclusion: The specificity of the CRA checklist was the parameter with the highest impact on the cost-effectiveness. Further primary data collection is needed to build models with less uncertainty in the parameters.<br /> (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1618-7601
Volume :
23
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34932169
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01419-5