Back to Search Start Over

BRAF mutation testing for patients diagnosed with stage III or stage IV melanoma: practical guidance for the Australian setting.

Authors :
Scolyer RA
Atkinson V
Gyorki DE
Lambie D
O'Toole S
Saw RPM
Amanuel B
Angel CM
Button-Sloan AE
Carlino MS
Ch'ng S
Colebatch AJ
Daneshvar D
Pires da Silva I
Dawson T
Ferguson PM
Foster-Smith E
Fox SB
Gill AJ
Gupta R
Henderson MA
Hong AM
Howle JR
Jackett LA
James C
Lee CS
Lochhead A
Loh D
McArthur GA
McLean CA
Menzies AM
Nieweg OE
O'Brien BH
Pennington TE
Potter AJ
Prakash S
Rawson RV
Read RL
Rtshiladze MA
Shannon KF
Smithers BM
Spillane AJ
Stretch JR
Thompson JF
Tucker P
Varey AHR
Vilain RE
Wood BA
Long GV
Source :
Pathology [Pathology] 2022 Feb; Vol. 54 (1), pp. 6-19. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Dec 20.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Targeted therapy (BRAF inhibitor plus MEK inhibitor) is now among the possible treatment options for patients with BRAF mutation-positive stage III or stage IV melanoma. This makes prompt BRAF mutation testing an important step in the management of patients diagnosed with stage III or IV melanoma; one that can help better ensure that the optimal choice of systemic treatment is initiated with minimal delay. This article offers guidance about when and how BRAF mutation testing should be conducted when patients are diagnosed with melanoma in Australia. Notably, it recommends that pathologists reflexively order BRAF mutation testing whenever a patient is found to have American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage III or IV melanoma (i.e., any metastatic spread beyond the primary tumour) and that patient's BRAF mutation status is hitherto unknown, even if BRAF mutation testing has not been specifically requested by the treating clinician (in Australia, Medicare-subsidised BRAF <superscript>V600</superscript> mutation testing does not need to be requested by the treating clinician). When performed in centres with appropriate expertise and experience, immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the anti-BRAF V600E monoclonal antibody (VE1) can be a highly sensitive and specific means of detecting BRAF <superscript>V600E</superscript> mutations, and may be used as a rapid and relatively inexpensive initial screening test. However, VE1 immunostaining can be technically challenging and difficult to interpret, particularly in heavily pigmented tumours; melanomas with weak, moderate or focal BRAF <superscript>V600E</superscript> immunostaining should be regarded as equivocal. It must also be remembered that other activating BRAF <superscript>V600</superscript> mutations (including BRAF <superscript>V600K</superscript> ), which account for ∼10-20% of BRAF <superscript>V600</superscript> mutations, are not detected with currently available IHC antibodies. For these reasons, if available and practicable, we recommend that DNA-based BRAF mutation testing always be performed, regardless of whether IHC-based testing is also conducted. Advice about tissue/specimen selection for BRAF mutation testing of patients diagnosed with stage III or IV melanoma is also offered in this article; and potential pitfalls when interpreting BRAF mutation tests are highlighted.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1465-3931
Volume :
54
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Pathology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34937664
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2021.11.002