Back to Search
Start Over
Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the DEG, a Three-Item Dyspnea Measure.
- Source :
-
Journal of general internal medicine [J Gen Intern Med] 2022 Aug; Vol. 37 (10), pp. 2541-2547. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jan 03. - Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- Background: Dyspnea is a common and debilitating symptom that affects many different patient populations. Dyspnea measures should assess multiple domains.<br />Objective: To evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of an ultra-brief, multi-dimensional dyspnea measure.<br />Design: We adapted the DEG from the PEG, a valid 3-item pain measure, to assess average dyspnea intensity (D), interference with enjoyment of life (E), and dyspnea burden with general activity (G).<br />Participants: We used data from a multi-site randomized clinical trial among outpatients with heart failure.<br />Main Measures: We evaluated reliability (Cronbach's alpha), concurrent validity with the Memorial-Symptom-Assessment-Scale (MSAS) shortness-of-breath distress-orbothersome item and 7-item Generalized-Anxiety-Disorder (GAD-7) scale, knowngroups validity with New-York-Heart-Association-Functional-Classification (NYHA) 1-2 or 3-4 and presence or absence of comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), responsiveness with the MSAS item as an anchor, and calculated a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) using distribution methods.<br />Key Results: Among 312 participants, the DEG was reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.92). The mean (standard deviation) DEG score was 5.26 (2.36) (range 0-10) points. DEG scores correlated strongly with the MSAS shortness of breath distress-or-bothersome item (r=0.66) and moderately with GAD-7 categories (ρ=0.36). DEG scores were statistically significantly lower among patients with NYHA 1-2 compared to 3-4 [mean difference (standard error): 1.22 (0.27) points, p<0.01], and those without compared to with comorbid COPD [0.87 (0.27) points, p<0.01]. The DEG was highly sensitive to change, with MCID of 0.59-1.34 points, or 11-25% change.<br />Conclusions: The novel, ultra-brief DEG measure is reliable, valid, and highly responsive. Future studies should evaluate the DEG's sensitivity to interventions, use anchor-based methods to triangulate MCID estimates, and determine its prognostic usefulness among patients with chronic cardiopulmonary and other diseases.<br /> (© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.)
- Subjects :
- Dyspnea diagnosis
Dyspnea epidemiology
Dyspnea etiology
Humans
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive complications
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive diagnosis
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive epidemiology
Quality of Life
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1525-1497
- Volume :
- 37
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of general internal medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 34981344
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07307-1