Back to Search Start Over

Different Effects of Biologics on Systemic Bone Loss Protection in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Interim Analysis of a Three-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors :
Chen MH
Yu SF
Chen JF
Chen WS
Liou TL
Chou CT
Hsu CY
Lai HM
Chen YC
Tsai CY
Cheng TT
Source :
Frontiers in immunology [Front Immunol] 2021 Dec 20; Vol. 12, pp. 783030. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Dec 20 (Print Publication: 2021).
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objective: To compare changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving three-year conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARD), tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFi), and abatacept.<br />Methods: Patients with RA were recruited from September 2014 to February 2021. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure BMD at the femoral neck (FN), total hip (TH), and lumbar spine (L1-4) at enrollment and three years later. Changes in the BMD of each regimen group were analyzed. Multiple ordinary least squares regression was used with the dependent variables to develop a model to predict the change in BMD.<br />Results: A total of 752 participants were enrolled and 485 completed the three-year follow-up period. Of these, 375 (Group I), 84 (Group II), and 26 (Group III) participants received csDMARDs, TNFi, and abatacept therapy, respectively. Considering both type of therapy and completion of the follow-up period, participants were divided into groups A (csDMARDs, n = 104), B (TNFi, n = 52), and C (abatacept, n = 26). Compared to baseline, BMD decreased significantly at FN (p = 0.003) and L1-4 (p = 0.002) in Group A and at L1-4 (p = 0.005) in Group B, but remained stable at all sites in Group C. In terms of regression-adjusted percent change in BMD, there was a significant difference seen at all measured sites between group C compared to both groups A and B (+0.8%, -2.7%, -1.8% at FN; +0.5%, -1.1%, -1.0% at TH; +0.8%, -2.0%, -3.5% at L1-4, respectively; all p < 0.05). Anti-osteoporosis therapy had a BMD-preserving effect in RA.<br />Conclusion: Compared with csDMARDs and TNFi, abatacept may have a better BMD-preserving effect in RA. Anti-osteoporosis therapy can prevent systemic bone loss irrespective of RA therapy.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2021 Chen, Yu, Chen, Chen, Liou, Chou, Hsu, Lai, Chen, Tsai and Cheng.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1664-3224
Volume :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Frontiers in immunology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
34987510
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.783030