Back to Search Start Over

Prospective clinical trial of disulfiram plus copper in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors :
Zhang T
Kephart J
Bronson E
Anand M
Daly C
Spasojevic I
Bakthavatsalam S
Franz K
Berg H
Karachaliou GS
James OG
Howard L
Halabi S
Harrison MR
Armstrong AJ
George DJ
Source :
The Prostate [Prostate] 2022 May; Vol. 82 (7), pp. 858-866. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 14.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: In preclinical models of prostate cancer (PC), disulfiram (DSF) reduced tumor growth only when co-administered with copper (Cu), and Cu uptake in tumors is partially regulated by androgen-receptor signaling. However, prior trials of DSF in PC used DSF as monotherapy.<br />Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of concurrent administration of DSF with Cu, we conducted a phase 1b clinical trial of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving Cu with DSF.<br />Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients with mCRPC were treated in two cohorts: mCRPC with nonliver/peritoneal metastases (A), and mCRPC with liver and/or peritoneal metastases (B). Baseline Cu avidity was measured by <superscript>64</superscript> CuCl <subscript>2</subscript> PET scan. Intravenous (IV) CuCl <subscript>2</subscript> was given weekly for three doses with oral daily DSF followed by daily oral Cu gluconate and DSF until disease progression. DSF and metabolite diethyldithiocarbamic acid methyl ester (Me-DDC) levels in plasma were measured. DSF and Me-DDC were then assessed for cytotoxicity in vitro.<br />Results: We treated nine patients with mCRPC (six on cohort A and three on cohort B). Bone and nodal metastases showed differential and heterogeneous Cu uptake on <superscript>64</superscript> CuCl <subscript>2</subscript> PET scans. No confirmed PSA declines or radiographic responses were observed. Median PFS was 2.8 months and median OS was 8.3 months. Common adverse events included fatigue and psychomotor depression; no Grade 4/5 AEs were observed. Me-DDC was measurable in all samples (LOQ = 0.512 ng/ml), whereas DSF was not (LOQ = 0.032 ng/ml, LOD = 0.01 ng/ml); Me-DDC was not cytotoxic in vitro.<br />Conclusions: Oral DSF is not an effective treatment for mCRPC due to rapid metabolism into an inactive metabolite, Me-DDC. This trial has stopped enrollment and further work is needed to identify a stable DSF formulation for treatment of mCRPC.<br /> (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-0045
Volume :
82
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Prostate
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35286730
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24329