Back to Search Start Over

The role of neutralizing antibodies by sVNT after two doses of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in a cohort of Italian healthcare workers.

Authors :
Infantino M
Manfredi M
Stacchini L
Cosma C
Grossi V
Lari B
Russo E
Amedei A
Benucci M
Veneziani F
Casprini P
Catalano CM
Cirrincione G
Bonaccorsi G
Pompetti A
Source :
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine [Clin Chem Lab Med] 2022 Mar 17; Vol. 60 (6), pp. 934-940. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 17 (Print Publication: 2022).
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluating anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels is a current priority to drive immunization, as well as to predict when a vaccine booster dose may be required and for which priority groups. The aim of our study was to investigate the kinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1 protein IgG (anti-S1 IgG) antibodies and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in an Italian cohort of healthcare workers (HCWs), following the Pfizer/BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, over a period of up to six months after the second dose.<br />Methods: We enrolled 57 HCWs, without clinical history of COVID-19 infection. Fluoroenzyme-immunoassay was used for the quantitative anti-S1 IgG antibodies at different time points T1 (one month), T3 (three months) and T6 (six months) following the second vaccine shot. Simultaneously, a commercial surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT) was used for the determination of NAbs, expressed as inhibition percentage (% IH).<br />Results: Median values of anti-S1 IgG antibodies decreased from T1 (1,452 BAU/mL) to T6 (104 BAU/mL) with a percent variation of 92.8% while the sVNT showed a percent variation of 34.3% for the same time frame. The decline in anti-S1 IgG antibodies from T1 to T6 was not accompanied by a loss of the neutralizing capacity of antibodies. In fact at T6 a neutralization percentage <20% IH was observed only in 3.51% of HCWs.<br />Conclusions: Our findings reveal that the decrease of anti-S1 IgG levels do not correspond in parallel to a decrease of NAbs over time, which highlights the necessity of using both assays to assess vaccination effectiveness.<br /> (© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1437-4331
Volume :
60
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35303766
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0170