Back to Search Start Over

Longitudinal Assessment of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted MRI Metrics in Cognitive Decline.

Authors :
Bergamino M
Burke A
Baxter LC
Caselli RJ
Sabbagh MN
Talboom JS
Huentelman MJ
Stokes AM
Source :
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI [J Magn Reson Imaging] 2022 Dec; Vol. 56 (6), pp. 1845-1862. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 23.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Advanced diffusion-based MRI biomarkers may provide insight into microstructural and perfusion changes associated with neurodegeneration and cognitive decline.<br />Purpose: To assess longitudinal microstructural and perfusion changes using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) parameters in cognitively impaired (CI) and healthy control (HC) groups.<br />Study Type: Prospective/longitudinal.<br />Population: Twelve CI patients (75% female) and 13 HC subjects (69% female).<br />Field Strength/sequence: 3 T; Spin-Echo-IVIM-DWI.<br />Assessment: Two MRI scans were performed with a 12-month interval. ADC and IVIM-DWI metrics (diffusion coefficient [D] and perfusion fraction [f]) were generated from monoexponential and biexponential fits, respectively. Additionally, voxel-based correlations were evaluated between change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (ΔMoCA) and baseline imaging parameters.<br />Statistical Tests: Analysis of covariance with sex and age as covariates was performed for main effects of group and time (false discovery rate [FDR] corrected) with post hoc comparisons using Bonferroni correction. Partial-η <superscript>2</superscript> and Hedges' g were used for effect-size analysis. Spearman's correlations (FDR corrected) were used for the relationship between ΔMoCA score and imaging. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.<br />Results: Significant differences were found for the main effects of group (HC vs. CI) and time. For group effects, higher ADC, IVIM-D, and IVIM-f were observed in the CI group compared to HC (ADC: 1.23 ± 0.08 <superscript>.</superscript> 10 <superscript>-3</superscript> vs. 1.09 ± 0.07 <superscript>.</superscript> 10 <superscript>-3</superscript>  mm <superscript>2</superscript> /sec; IVIM-D: 0.82 ± 0.01 <superscript>.</superscript> 10 <superscript>-3</superscript> vs. 0.73 ± 0.01 <superscript>.</superscript> 10 <superscript>-3</superscript>  mm <superscript>2</superscript> /sec; and IVIM-f: 0.317 ± 0.008 vs. 0.253 ± 0.009). Significantly higher ADC, IVIM-D, and IVIM-f values were observed in the CI group after 12 months (ADC: 1.45 ± 0.05 <superscript>.</superscript> 10 <superscript>-3</superscript> vs. 1.50 ± 0.07 <superscript>.</superscript> 10 <superscript>-3</superscript>  mm <superscript>2</superscript> /sec; IVIM-D: 0.87 ± 0.01 <superscript>.</superscript> 10 <superscript>-3</superscript> vs. 0.94 ± 0.02 <superscript>.</superscript> 10 <superscript>-3</superscript>  mm <superscript>2</superscript> /sec; and IVIM-f: 0.303 ± 0.007 vs. 0.332 ± 0.008), but not in the HC group at large effect size. ADC, IVIM-D, and IVIM-f negatively correlated with ΔMoCA score (ρ = -0.49, -0.51, and -0.50, respectively).<br />Data Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that longitudinal differences between CI and HC cohorts can be measured using IVIM-based metrics.<br />Level of Evidence: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.<br /> (© 2022 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1522-2586
Volume :
56
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35319142
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28172