Start Over

Analysis of quality information provided by "Dr. YouTube TM " on Phimosis.

Authors :: Cilio S
Collà Ruvolo C
Turco C
Creta M
Capece M
La Rocca R
Celentano G
Califano G
Morra S
Melchionna A
Mangiapia F
Crocetto F
Verze P
Palmieri A
Imbimbo C
Mirone V
Source :: International journal of impotence research [Int J Impot Res] 2023 Jun; Vol. 35 (4), pp. 398-403. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 24.
Publication Year :: 2023
Abstract: The objective of the current study was to evaluate the quality of the information provided in YouTube <superscript>TM</superscript> videos on phimosis. The term "phimosis" was searched on YouTube <superscript>TM</superscript> , and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) for Audio/Visual Materials (Understandability and Actionability sections, good-quality score of minimum 70%) and misinformation scale (rated from 1 to 5) were used to assess video quality. Quality assessment was investigated over time. Of all, 60 were eligible for analysis. Healthcare providers were the authors of 75.0% of the videos, and 73.3% of the videos were patient-targeted. The median Understandability score was 42.9% (interquartile range [IQR]:34.5-58.9) and ranged from 28.6 to 42.9% (2013-2020). The median Actionability score was 50.0% (IQR:25.0-56.2) and ranged from 25.0 to 50.0% (2013-2020). The median misinformation score was 2.8/5 (IQR:1.6-3.6), and although the score fluctuated over time, the median score was 2.6 both in 2013 and in 2020. According to our results, although an increase of PEMAT over time was observed, the overall quality of the information uploaded on YouTube <superscript>TM</superscript> is low. Therefore, at present, YouTube <superscript>TM</superscript> cannot be recommended as a reliable source of information on phimosis. Video producers should upload higher-quality videos to help physicians and patients in the decision-making process.<br /> (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)