Back to Search Start Over

Interobserver Variability in CT-based Morphologic Tumor Response Assessment of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors :
Wesdorp NJ
Kemna R
Bolhuis K
van Waesberghe JHTM
Nota IMGC
Struik F
Oulad Abdennabi I
Phoa SSKS
van Dieren S
van Amerongen MJ
Chapelle T
Dejong CHC
Engelbrecht MRW
Gerhards MF
Grünhagen D
van Gulik TM
Hermans JJ
de Jong KP
Klaase JM
Liem MSL
van Lienden KP
Molenaar IQ
Patijn GA
Rijken AM
Ruers TM
Verhoef C
de Wilt JHW
Swijnenburg RJ
Punt CJA
Huiskens J
Stoker J
Kazemier G
Source :
Radiology. Imaging cancer [Radiol Imaging Cancer] 2022 May; Vol. 4 (3), pp. e210105.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate interobserver variability in the morphologic tumor response assessment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) managed with systemic therapy and to assess the relation of morphologic response with gene mutation status, targeted therapy, and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 measurements. Materials and Methods Participants with initially unresectable CRLM receiving different systemic therapy regimens from the randomized, controlled CAIRO5 trial (NCT02162563) were included in this prospective imaging study. Three radiologists independently assessed morphologic tumor response on baseline and first follow-up CT scans according to previously published criteria. Two additional radiologists evaluated disagreement cases. Interobserver agreement was calculated by using Fleiss κ. On the basis of the majority of individual radiologic assessments, the final morphologic tumor response was determined. Finally, the relation of morphologic tumor response and clinical prognostic parameters was assessed. Results In total, 153 participants (median age, 63 years [IQR, 56-71]; 101 men) with 306 CT scans comprising 2192 CRLM were included. Morphologic assessment performed by the three radiologists yielded 86 (56%) agreement cases and 67 (44%) disagreement cases (including four major disagreement cases). Overall interobserver agreement between the panel radiologists on morphology groups and morphologic response categories was moderate (κ = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.58 and κ = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.60). Optimal morphologic response was particularly observed in patients treated with bevacizumab ( P = .001) and in patients with RAS/BRAF mutation ( P = .04). No evidence of a relationship between RECIST 1.1 and morphologic response was found ( P = .61). Conclusion Morphologic tumor response assessment following systemic therapy in participants with CRLM demonstrated considerable interobserver variability. Keywords: Tumor Response, Observer Performance, CT, Liver, Metastases, Oncology, Abdomen/Gastrointestinal Clinical trial registration no. NCT02162563 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2638-616X
Volume :
4
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Radiology. Imaging cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35522139
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.210105