Back to Search Start Over

Impact of Metastasectomy on Cancer Specific and Overall Survival in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of the REMARCC Registry.

Authors :
Meagher MF
Mir MC
Autorino R
Minervini A
Kriegmair M
Maurer T
Porpiglia F
Van Bruwaene S
Linares E
Hevia V
Musquera M
Roussel E
Pavan N
Antonelli A
Zhang S
Ghali F
Patel D
Javier-Desloges J
Bradshaw A
Rubio J
Guruli G
Tracey A
Campi R
Albersen M
Furlan M
McKay RR
Derweesh IH
Source :
Clinical genitourinary cancer [Clin Genitourin Cancer] 2022 Aug; Vol. 20 (4), pp. 326-333. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Apr 09.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Treatment paradigms for management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are evolving. We examined impact of surgical metastasectomy on survival across in mRCC stratified by risk-group.<br />Methods: Multicenter retrospective analysis from the Registry of Metastatic RCC database. The cohort was subdivided utilizing Motzer criteria (favorable-, intermediate-, high-risk). Primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM)/overall survival (OS); secondary outcome was cancer-specific mortality (CSM)/cancer-specific survival (CSS). Impact of metastasectomy was analyzed via Cox-Regression analysis adjusting for potential prognostic variables and Kaplan-Meier analysis (KMA) within each risk-group.<br />Results: Four hundred thirty-one patients (59 favorable-risk, 274 intermediate-risk, 98 high-risk; median follow-up 27.2 months) were analyzed. Metastasectomy was performed in 22 (37%), 66 (24%), and 32 (16%) of favorable-, intermediate- and high-risk groups (P = .012). Median number of metastases at diagnosis differed significantly (favorable-risk 2, intermediate-risk 3.4, high-risk 5.1, P < .001). On Cox-regression, high-risk (HR = 1.72, P = .002) was associated with worsened ACM, while metastasectomy was associated with improved ACM (HR = 0.56, P = .005). On KMA, median OS (months) was longer with metastasectomy in favorable- (92.7 vs. 25.8, P = .003) and intermediate-risk (26.3 vs. 20.1, P = .038), but not high-risk (P = .911) groups. Metastasectomy was associated with longer CSS in favorable- (76.1 vs. 32.8, P = .004) but not intermediate- (P = .06) and high-risk (P = .595) groups.<br />Conclusions: Metastasectomy was independently associated with improved ACM and CSM, as well as improved CSS and OS in favorable- and intermediate-risk mRCC patients. Metastasectomy may be considered as component of multimodal management strategy in favorable and intermediate-risk subgroups. In high-risk patients, metastasectomy should be deferred except in select circumstances.<br /> (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1938-0682
Volume :
20
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical genitourinary cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35585014
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2022.03.013