Impact and benefit-cost ratio of a program for the management of latent tuberculosis infection among refugees in a region of Canada.

Introduction: The identification and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among immigrants from high-incidence regions who move to low-incidence countries is generally considered an ineffective strategy because only ≈14% of them comply with the multiple steps of the 'cascade of care' and complete treatment. In the Estrie region of Canada, a refugee clinic was opened in 2009. One of its goals is LTBI management.
Methods: Key components of this intervention included: close collaboration with community organizations, integration within a comprehensive package of medical care for the whole family, timely delivery following arrival, shorter treatment through preferential use of rifampin, and risk-based selection of patients to be treated. Between 2009-2020, 5131 refugees were evaluated. To determine the efficacy and benefit-cost ratio of this intervention, records of refugees seen in 2010-14 (n = 1906) and 2018-19 (n = 1638) were reviewed. Cases of tuberculosis (TB) among our foreign-born population occurring before (1997-2008) and after (2009-2020) setting up the clinic were identified. All costs associated with TB or LTBI were measured.
Results: Out of 441 patients offered LTBI treatment, 374 (85%) were compliant. Adding other losses, overall compliance was 69%. To prevent one case of TB, 95.1 individuals had to be screened and 11.9 treated, at a cost of $16,056. After discounting, each case of TB averted represented $32,631, for a benefit-cost ratio of 2.03. Among nationals of the 20 countries where refugees came from, incidence of TB decreased from 68.2 (1997-2008) to 26.3 per 100,000 person-years (2009-2020). Incidence among foreign-born persons from all other countries not targeted by the intervention did not change.
Conclusions: Among refugees settling in our region, 69% completed the LTBI cascade of care, leading to a 61% reduction in TB incidence. This intervention was cost-beneficial. Current defeatism towards LTBI management among immigrants and refugees is misguided. Compliance can be enhanced through simple measures.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.