Back to Search Start Over

Realistic rates of nitrogen addition increase carbon flux rates but do not change soil carbon stocks in a temperate grassland.

Authors :
Wilcots ME
Schroeder KM
DeLancey LC
Kjaer SJ
Hobbie SE
Seabloom EW
Borer ET
Source :
Global change biology [Glob Chang Biol] 2022 Aug; Vol. 28 (16), pp. 4819-4831. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jun 02.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Changes in the biosphere carbon (C) sink are of utmost importance given rising atmospheric CO <subscript>2</subscript> levels. Concurrent global changes, such as increasing nitrogen (N) deposition, are affecting how much C can be stored in terrestrial ecosystems. Understanding the extent of these impacts will help in predicting the fate of the biosphere C sink. However, most N addition experiments add N in rates that greatly exceed ambient rates of N deposition, making inference from current knowledge difficult. Here, we leveraged data from a 13-year N addition gradient experiment with addition rates spanning realistic rates of N deposition (0, 1, 5, and 10 g N m <superscript>-2</superscript>  year <superscript>-1</superscript> ) to assess the rates of N addition at which C uptake and storage were stimulated in a temperate grassland. Very low rates of N addition stimulated gross primary productivity and plant biomass, but also stimulated ecosystem respiration such that there was no net change in C uptake or storage. Furthermore, we found consistent, nonlinear relationships between N addition rate and plant responses such that intermediate rates of N addition induced the greatest ecosystem responses. Soil pH and microbial biomass and respiration all declined with increasing N addition indicating that negative consequences of N addition have direct effects on belowground processes, which could then affect whole ecosystem C uptake and storage. Our work demonstrates that experiments that add large amounts of N may be underestimating the effect of low to intermediate rates of N deposition on grassland C cycling. Furthermore, we show that plant biomass does not reliably indicate rates of C uptake or soil C storage, and that measuring rates of C loss (i.e., ecosystem and soil respiration) in conjunction with rates of C uptake and C pools are crucial for accurately understanding grassland C storage.<br /> (© 2022 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1365-2486
Volume :
28
Issue :
16
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Global change biology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35593000
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16272