Back to Search Start Over

Intracochlear pressure as an objective measure for perceived loudness with bone conduction implants.

Authors :
Putzeys T
Borgers C
Fierens G
Walraevens J
Van Wieringen A
Verhaert N
Source :
Hearing research [Hear Res] 2022 Sep 01; Vol. 422, pp. 108550. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 May 29.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: The generally accepted method to assess the functionality of novel bone conduction implants in a preclinical stage is to experimentally measure the vibratory response of the cochlear promontory. Yet, bone conduction of sound is a complex propagation phenomenon, depending on both frequency and amplitude, involving different conduction pathways.<br />Objectives: The aim of this study is to validate the use of intracochlear sound pressure (ICP) as an objective indicator for perceived loudness for bone conduction stimulation. It is investigated whether a correlation exists between intracochlear sound pressure measurements in cadaveric temporal bones and clinically obtained results using the outcome of a loudness balancing experiment.<br />Methods: Ten normal hearing subjects were asked to balance the perceived loudness between air conducted (AC) sound and bone conducted (BC) sound by changing the AC stimulus. Mean balanced thresholds were calculated and used as stimulation levels in a cadaver trial (N = 4) where intracochlear sound pressure was measured during AC and BC stimulation to assess the correlation with the measured clinical data. The intracochlear pressure was measured at the relatively low stimulation amplitude of 80 dBHL using a lock-in amplification technique.<br />Results: Applying AC and BC stimulation at equal perceived loudness on cadaveric heads yield a similar differential intracochlear pressure, with differences between AC and BC falling within the range of variability of normal hearing test subjects.<br />Conclusion: Comparing the perceived loudness at 80 dB HL for both AC and BC validates intracochlear pressure as an objective indicator of the cochlear drive. The measurement setup is more time-intensive than measuring the vibratory response of the cochlear promontory, yet it provides direct information on the level of the cochlear scalae.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of interest This work has been supported by Flanders Innovation and Entrepreneurship (IWT155047). TP is fully funded by Research Foundation Flanders (FWO 12Y6919N). GF, CB and JW are currently employees of Cochlear Ltd. GF is partly funded by Flanders Innovation and Entrepreneurship (HBC.2018.0184), NV has a senior clinical investigator fund of Research Foundation Flanders (FWO 1804816N).<br /> (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1878-5891
Volume :
422
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Hearing research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35689853
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2022.108550