Postmastectomy Reconstruction in Male Breast Cancer.

Introduction: Less than 1% of all breast cancers are diagnosed in males. In females, postmastectomy breast reconstruction is associated with increased patient satisfaction. However, there is a paucity of literature describing reconstructive options for postmastectomy deformity in the male chest. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate postmastectomy reconstruction outcomes in males with breast cancer.
Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were queried for records pertaining to the study question using medical subject heading (MeSH) terms such as "male breast cancer," "mastectomy," and "reconstruction." No limitations were placed on the year of publication, country of origin, or study size. Study characteristics and patient demographics were collected. Primary outcomes of interest included postoperative complications, recurrence rate, and mortality rate.
Results: A total of 11 articles examining 29 male patients with breast cancer who underwent postmastectomy reconstruction were included for analysis. Literature was most commonly available in the form of case reports. The average age was 59.6 +/-11.4 years. Reconstruction methods included fat grafting ( n  = 1, 3.4%), silicone implants ( n  = 1, 3.4%), and autologous chest wall reconstruction with local flaps ( n  = 26, 89.7%). Postoperative complications occurred in two patients (6.8%), including partial nipple necrosis ( n  = 1) and hypertrophic scarring ( n  = 1). Of the studies reporting patient satisfaction, all patients were pleased with the aesthetic appearance of their chest.
Conclusion: This systematic review revealed the limited availability of research regarding postmastectomy chest reconstruction in males with breast cancer. Nevertheless, the evidence available suggests that reconstruction can restore a patient's body image and, thus, should be regularly considered and discussed with male patients. Larger studies are warranted to further shed light on this population.
Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2022 Romina Deldar et al.)