Back to Search Start Over

High-Flow Versus VenturiMask Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Reintubation in Hypoxemic Patients after Extubation: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors :
Maggiore SM
Jaber S
Grieco DL
Mancebo J
Zakynthinos S
Demoule A
Ricard JD
Navalesi P
Vaschetto R
Hraiech S
Klouche K
Frat JP
Lemiale V
Fanelli V
Chanques G
Natalini D
Ischaki E
Reuter D
Morán I
La Combe B
Longhini F
De Gaetano A
Ranieri VM
Brochard LJ
Antonelli M
Source :
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine [Am J Respir Crit Care Med] 2022 Dec 15; Vol. 206 (12), pp. 1452-1462.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Rationale: When compared with VenturiMask after extubation, high-flow nasal oxygen provides physiological advantages. Objectives: To establish whether high-flow oxygen prevents endotracheal reintubation in hypoxemic patients after extubation, compared with VenturiMask. Methods: In this multicenter randomized trial, 494 patients exhibiting Pa <subscript>O <subscript>2</subscript> </subscript> :Fi <subscript>O <subscript>2</subscript> </subscript> ratio ⩽ 300 mm Hg after extubation were randomly assigned to receive high-flow or VenturiMask oxygen, with the possibility to apply rescue noninvasive ventilation before reintubation. High-flow use in the VenturiMask group was not permitted. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was the rate of reintubation within 72 hours according to predefined criteria, which were validated a posteriori by an independent adjudication committee. Main secondary outcomes included reintubation rate at 28 days and the need for rescue noninvasive ventilation according to predefined criteria. After intubation criteria validation ( n  = 492 patients), 32 patients (13%) in the high-flow group and 27 patients (11%) in the VenturiMask group required reintubation at 72 hours (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.26 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-2.26]; P  = 0.49). At 28 days, the rate of reintubation was 21% in the high-flow group and 23% in the VenturiMask group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.60-1.31]; P  = 0.55). The need for rescue noninvasive ventilation was significantly lower in the high-flow group than in the VenturiMask group: at 72 hours, 8% versus 17% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.22-0.71]; P  = 0.002) and at 28 days, 12% versus 21% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.32-0.83]; P  = 0.007). Conclusions: Reintubation rate did not significantly differ between patients treated with VenturiMask or high-flow oxygen after extubation. High-flow oxygen yielded less frequent use of rescue noninvasive ventilation. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02107183).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1535-4970
Volume :
206
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35849787
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202201-0065OC