Back to Search Start Over

Perfusion Imaging and Clinical Outcome in Acute Minor Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion.

Authors :
Seners P
Arquizan C
Fontaine L
Ben Hassen W
Heldner MR
Strambo D
Nagel S
Carrera E
Mechtouff L
McCullough-Hicks M
Mohammaden MH
Cottier JP
Henon H
Aignatoaie A
Laksiri N
Papassin J
Lucas L
Garnier P
Triquenot A
Mione G
Hajdu S
Costalat V
Potreck A
Detante O
Bonneville F
Berthezene Y
Bracard S
Sibon I
Bricout N
Boutet C
Mordasini P
Michel P
Oppenheim C
Olivot JM
Nogueira RG
Albers GW
Baron JC
Turc G
Source :
Stroke [Stroke] 2022 Nov; Vol. 53 (11), pp. 3429-3438. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Jul 12.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Whether bridging therapy (intravenous thrombolysis [IVT] followed by mechanical thrombectomy) is superior to IVT alone in minor stroke with large vessel occlusion is unknown. Perfusion imaging may identify subsets of large vessel occlusion-related minor stroke patients with distinct response to bridging therapy.<br />Methods: We conducted a multicenter international observational study of consecutive IVT-treated patients with minor stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤5) who had an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion and perfusion imaging performed before IVT, with a subset undergoing immediate thrombectomy. Propensity score with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to account for baseline between-groups differences. The primary outcome was 3-month modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1. We searched for an interaction between treatment group and mismatch volume (critical hypoperfusion-core volume).<br />Results: Overall, 569 patients were included (172 and 397 in the bridging therapy and IVT groups, respectively). After propensity-score weighting, the distribution of baseline variables was similar across the 2 groups. In the entire population, bridging was associated with lower odds of achieving modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1: odds ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55-0.96]; P =0.03. However, mismatch volume modified the effect of bridging on clinical outcome ( P <subscript>interaction</subscript> =0.04 for continuous mismatch volume); bridging was associated with worse outcome in patients with, but not in those without, mismatch volume <40 mL (odds ratio, [95% CI] for modified Rankin Scale score 0-1: 0.48 [0.33-0.71] versus 1.14 [0.76-1.71], respectively). Bridging was associated with higher incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in the entire population, but this effect was present in the small mismatch subset only ( P <subscript>interaction</subscript> =0.002).<br />Conclusions: In our population of large vessel occlusion-related minor stroke patients, bridging therapy was associated with lower rates of good outcome as compared with IVT alone. However, mismatch volume was a strong modifier of the effect of bridging therapy over IVT alone, notably with worse outcome with bridging therapy in patients with mismatch volume ≤40 mL. Randomized trials should consider adding perfusion imaging for patient selection.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1524-4628
Volume :
53
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Stroke
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35862225
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.039182