Back to Search Start Over

Docetaxel for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: Long-Term Survival Outcomes in the STAMPEDE Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors :
James ND
Ingleby FC
Clarke NW
Amos CL
Attard G
Brawley CD
Chowdhury S
Cross W
Dearnaley DP
Gilbert DC
Gillessen S
Jones RJ
Langley RE
Macnair A
Malik ZI
Mason MD
Matheson DJ
Millman R
Parker CC
Rush HL
Russell JM
Au C
Ritchie AWS
Mestre RP
Ahmed I
Birtle AJ
Brock SJ
Das P
Ford VA
Gray EK
Hughes RJ
Manetta CB
McLaren DB
Nikapota AD
O'Sullivan JM
Perna C
Peedell C
Protheroe AS
Sundar S
Tanguay JS
Tolan SP
Wagstaff J
Wallace JB
Wylie JP
Zarkar A
Parmar MKB
Sydes MR
Source :
JNCI cancer spectrum [JNCI Cancer Spectr] 2022 Jul 01; Vol. 6 (4).
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: STAMPEDE previously reported adding upfront docetaxel improved overall survival for prostate cancer patients starting long-term androgen deprivation therapy. We report long-term results for non-metastatic patients using, as primary outcome, metastatic progression-free survival (mPFS), an externally demonstrated surrogate for overall survival.<br />Methods: Standard of care (SOC) was androgen deprivation therapy with or without radical prostate radiotherapy. A total of 460 SOC and 230 SOC plus docetaxel were randomly assigned 2:1. Standard survival methods and intention to treat were used. Treatment effect estimates were summarized from adjusted Cox regression models, switching to restricted mean survival time if non-proportional hazards. mPFS (new metastases, skeletal-related events, or prostate cancer death) had 70% power (α = 0.05) for a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.70. Secondary outcome measures included overall survival, failure-free survival (FFS), and progression-free survival (PFS: mPFS, locoregional progression).<br />Results: Median follow-up was 6.5 years with 142 mPFS events on SOC (3 year and 54% increases over previous report). There was no good evidence of an advantage to SOC plus docetaxel on mPFS (HR = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66 to 1.19; P = .43); with 5-year mPFS 82% (95% CI = 78% to 87%) SOC plus docetaxel vs 77% (95% CI = 73% to 81%) SOC. Secondary outcomes showed evidence SOC plus docetaxel improved FFS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.88; P = .002) and PFS (nonproportional P = .03, restricted mean survival time difference = 5.8 months, 95% CI = 0.5 to 11.2; P = .03) but no good evidence of overall survival benefit (125 SOC deaths; HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.64 to 1.21; P = .44). There was no evidence SOC plus docetaxel increased late toxicity: post 1 year, 29% SOC and 30% SOC plus docetaxel grade 3-5 toxicity.<br />Conclusions: There is robust evidence that SOC plus docetaxel improved FFS and PFS (previously shown to increase quality-adjusted life-years), without excess late toxicity, which did not translate into benefit for longer-term outcomes. This may influence patient management in individual cases.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2515-5091
Volume :
6
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JNCI cancer spectrum
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35877084
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkac043