Back to Search Start Over

Ancestral SARS-CoV-2, but not Omicron, replicates less efficiently in primary pediatric nasal epithelial cells.

Authors :
Zhu Y
Chew KY
Wu M
Karawita AC
McCallum G
Steele LE
Yamamoto A
Labzin LI
Yarlagadda T
Khromykh AA
Wang X
Sng JDJ
Stocks CJ
Xia Y
Kollmann TR
Martino D
Joensuu M
Meunier FA
Balistreri G
Bielefeldt-Ohmann H
Bowen AC
Kicic A
Sly PD
Spann KM
Short KR
Source :
PLoS biology [PLoS Biol] 2022 Aug 01; Vol. 20 (8), pp. e3001728. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Aug 01 (Print Publication: 2022).
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Children typically experience more mild symptoms of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) when compared to adults. There is a strong body of evidence that children are also less susceptible to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection with the ancestral viral isolate. However, the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) has been associated with an increased number of pediatric infections. Whether this is the result of widespread adult vaccination or fundamental changes in the biology of SARS-CoV-2 remain to be determined. Here, we use primary nasal epithelial cells (NECs) from children and adults, differentiated at an air-liquid interface to show that the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 replicates to significantly lower titers in the NECs of children compared to those of adults. This was associated with a heightened antiviral response to SARS-CoV-2 in the NECs of children. Importantly, the Delta variant also replicated to significantly lower titers in the NECs of children. This trend was markedly less pronounced in the case of Omicron. It is also striking to note that, at least in terms of viral RNA, Omicron replicated better in pediatric NECs compared to both Delta and the ancestral virus. Taken together, these data show that the nasal epithelium of children supports lower infection and replication of ancestral SARS-CoV-2, although this may be changing as the virus evolves.<br />Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: KRS is a consultant for Sanofi, Roche and NovoNordisk. The opinions and data presented in this manuscript are of the authors and are independent of these relationships.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1545-7885
Volume :
20
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
PLoS biology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
35913989
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001728