Repeated Pulmonary Metastasectomy: Third Operations and Beyond.

Background: For extrathoracic malignant neoplasms that have metastasized to the lungs, previous investigations have demonstrated both oncologic and survival benefits after pulmonary and repeated metastasectomy. Little is known about the feasibility of incrementally increasing numbers of subsequent metastasectomy procedures.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent ≥3 pulmonary resection procedures for recurrent, metachronous metastatic disease of nonlung primary malignant neoplasms at a single institution between 1992 and 2020. Primary outcomes collected pertained to safety and feasibility, including estimated blood loss (EBL), hospital length of stay, and details of postoperative complications.
Results: There were 117 patients who met inclusion criteria, having undergone at least 3 metastasectomy operations, with 55 (47.1%) undergoing a fourth operation and 20 (17.1%) undergoing a fifth operation. EBL did not differ between first and second operations (106.6 mL vs 102.5 mL; P = .76). It was, however, significantly greater at third operations (102.5 mL vs 238.7 mL; P = .000016). We noted an increase in wound complications between the second and third operations (0.9% vs 6.8%; P = .02) and incremental increases in likelihood of prolonged air leak with each subsequent operation. The need for reoperation was low for all and similar between operations. Importantly, hospital length of stay was similar for all procedures, as were the frequencies of hospital readmission.
Conclusions: Third-time redo pulmonary metastasectomy can be performed safely and feasibly in select patients. Further repeated resection should remain a therapeutic option for patients, although risks for potentially longer operating time, greater EBL, and prolonged air leaks may be anticipated.
(Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)