Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in patients with severe chronic kidney disease.

Objectives: To compare surgical and functional outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma with stage 4 chronic kidney disease.
Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 60 patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate 15-30 ml/min/1.73 m ² ) who underwent partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma between April 2004 and April 2020. We compared perioperative outcomes according to the surgical approach. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for end-stage renal disease.
Results: Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy were performed in 31 and 29 patients, respectively. The median age was 68 years and 17% of all patients were women. Patient and tumor characteristics did not differ between groups. The operative time (155.2 vs. 221.0 min, p < 0.0001) and the postoperative length of hospital stay (5.2 vs. 10.6 days, p = 0.0083) were significantly shorter, and the estimated blood loss was lower (53.4 vs. 363.2 ml, p = 0.0003) in the robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy group than in the open partial nephrectomy group. Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate was the only significant predictor of end-stage renal disease after partial nephrectomy on multivariable analysis.
Conclusions: Both procedures preserved renal function in this patient cohort, delaying the requirement for postoperative dialysis. Furthermore, robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was associated with shorter operative time and postoperative length of hospital stay, as well as lesser estimated blood loss than open partial nephrectomy.
(© 2022 The Japanese Urological Association.)