[Efficacy and prognosis of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone].

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of VRD (bortezomib+lenalidomide+dexamethasone) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients as well as the effect of the regimen on the long-term prognosis. Methods: The clinical characteristics, survival rates, response rates and minimal residual disease (MRD) of patients with NDMM at Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital from January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Subgroup analysis was also performed among groups according to the cytogenetics and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) of patients. Results: A total of 87 patients were retrospectively analyzed. The age[ M ( Q ₁ , Q ₃ )] of all patients was 56 (51, 61) years and males and females accounted for 58.6% (51/87) and 41.4% (36/87), respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was 95.9% (71/74) after 2 courses of induction therapy, with 13.5% (10/74) achieving the deep response [complete response (CR) or better] and 51.3% (38/74) of patients achieving a very good partial response (VGPR) or better. After 4 courses of induction therapy, the ORR achieved 95.2% (60/63), and the proportions of the deep response and VGPR or better grew up to 46.0% (29/63) and 77.7% (49/63). According to the treatment, the patients (≤65 years old) were divided into transplantation group and non-transplantation group. After the induction therapy, 88.8% (32/36) of patients in the transplantation group achieved VGPR or better, and 55.5% (20/36) reached the deep response. After the transplantation, the proportion increased to 97.1% (34/35) and 77.2% (27/35), respectively(88.8% vs 97.1%, P =0.174;55.5% vs 77.2%, P =0.055), with the rate of undetectable MRD increasing from 44.4% (16/36) to 77.8% (28/36) ( P =0.004). In the non-transplantation group, 74.2% (23/31) of patients achieved VGPR or better after 4 courses of induction therapy, 35.5% (11/31) of the patients achieved deep response and the rate of undetectable MRD was 37.0% (10/27). Compared with the non-transplantation group, transplantation was associated with a higher rate of complete response (89.5% vs 53.1%, P <0.001) and a lower rate of MRD detection(78.4% vs 55.2%, P =0.045). The median follow-up time of all patients was 26.3 months (20.8, 33.8). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached. The three-year PFS and OS rates were 78.4% and 87.2%, respectively. None of the standard-risk group, the high-risk group, the transplantation group and non-transplantation group achieved the median PFS and OS. Conclusions: VRD regimen has a promising efficacy and results in a substantial survival benefit. ASCT after VRD induction therapy is associated with higher rate of deep response, higher rate of undetectable MRD and longer survival.