Back to Search
Start Over
Artificial intelligence based image quality enhancement in liver MRI: a quantitative and qualitative evaluation.
- Source :
-
La Radiologia medica [Radiol Med] 2022 Oct; Vol. 127 (10), pp. 1098-1105. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Sep 07. - Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- Purpose: To compare liver MRI with AIR Recon Deep Learning™(ARDL) algorithm applied and turned-off (NON-DL) with conventional high-resolution acquisition (NAÏVE) sequences, in terms of quantitative and qualitative image analysis and scanning time.<br />Material and Methods: This prospective study included fifty consecutive volunteers (31 female, mean age 55.5 ± 20 years) from September to November 2021. 1.5 T MRI was performed and included three sets of images: axial single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) T2 images, diffusion-weighted images(DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) maps acquired with both ARDL and NAÏVE protocol; the NON-DL images, were also assessed. Two radiologists in consensus drew fixed regions of interest in liver parenchyma to calculate signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and contrast to-noise-ratio (CNR). Subjective image quality was assessed by two other radiologists independently with a five-point Likert scale. Acquisition time was recorded.<br />Results: SSFSE T2 objective analysis showed higher SNR and CNR for ARDL vs NAÏVE, ARDL vs NON-DL(all P < 0.013). Regarding DWI, no differences were found for SNR with ARDL vs NAÏVE and, ARDL vs NON-DL (all P > 0.2517).CNR was higher for ARDL vs NON-DL(P = 0.0170), whereas no differences were found between ARDL and NAÏVE(P = 1). No differences were observed for all three comparisons, in terms of SNR and CNR, for ADC maps (all P > 0.32). Qualitative analysis for all sequences showed better overall image quality for ARDL with lower truncation artifacts, higher sharpness and contrast (all P < 0.0070) with excellent inter-rater agreement (k ≥ 0.8143). Acquisition time was lower in ARDL sequences compared to NAÏVE (SSFSE T2 = 19.08 ± 2.5 s vs. 24.1 ± 2 s and DWI = 207.3 ± 54 s vs. 513.6 ± 98.6 s, all P < 0.0001).<br />Conclusion: ARDL applied on upper abdomen showed overall better image quality and reduced scanning time compared with NAÏVE protocol.<br /> (© 2022. The Author(s).)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1826-6983
- Volume :
- 127
- Issue :
- 10
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- La Radiologia medica
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 36070066
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01539-9