Back to Search Start Over

Diagnosis of bacterial meningitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, and Haemophilus influenzae using a multiplex real-time PCR technique.

Authors :
Carnalla-Barajas MN
Soto-Noguerón A
Martínez-Medina L
Olvera-Herrera ME
Mosqueda-Gómez JL
Rodríguez-Cortez P
Morfin-Otero R
Rodriguez-Noriega E
Luévanos-Velázquez A
Merlo-Palomera M
Esparza-Ahumada S
Márquez-Díaz F
Alpuche-Aranda CM
Echaniz-Aviles G
Source :
Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] [Braz J Microbiol] 2022 Dec; Vol. 53 (4), pp. 1951-1958. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Sep 15.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Bacterial meningitis is one of the diseases that, despite the introduction of several vaccines, remains a serious public health concern. Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spn), Neisseria meningitidis (Nm), and Haemophilus influenzae (Hi) are responsible for most cases diagnosed in children, adolescents, and adult population. Rapid, sensitive, and specific laboratory assays are critical for effective diagnosis and treatment, particularly in countries like Mexico in which culture positivity rates are very low due to the use of antibiotics prior to sample collection and to delay in transporting samples to the laboratory. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as a rapid diagnostic test for bacterial meningitis and compare these results with bacterial culture in three general hospitals in Mexico. During a 5-year period (2014-2018), a total of 512 CSF samples obtained from patients in whom infectious meningitis was suspected as initial clinical diagnosis were tested with RT-PCR with species-specific targets for the three pathogens. For Spn, 5.07% samples were RT-PCR positive; 0.39% for Nm and none for Hi. Only five RT-PCR Spn positive samples had a positive culture. Sensitivity and specificity estimates for RT-PCR are 100% and 95.46%, respectively. DNA amplification methods can provide better sensitive diagnostic tests than the reference standard, which is culture, particularly when antimicrobial treatment is initiated before clinical samples can be obtained.<br /> (© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1678-4405
Volume :
53
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36107398
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-022-00826-x