Back to Search Start Over

Sintilimab versus docetaxel as second-line treatment in advanced or metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, randomized controlled phase 3 trial (ORIENT-3).

Authors :
Shi Y
Wu L
Yu X
Xing P
Wang Y
Zhou J
Wang A
Shi J
Hu Y
Wang Z
An G
Fang Y
Sun S
Zhou C
Wang C
Ye F
Li X
Wang J
Wang M
Liu Y
Zhao Y
Yuan Y
Feng J
Chen Z
Shi J
Sun T
Wu G
Shu Y
Guo Q
Zhang Y
Song Y
Zhang S
Chen Y
Li W
Niu H
Hu W
Wang L
Huang J
Zhang Y
Cheng Y
Wu Z
Peng B
Sun J
Mancao C
Wang Y
Sun L
Source :
Cancer communications (London, England) [Cancer Commun (Lond)] 2022 Dec; Vol. 42 (12), pp. 1314-1330. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Nov 06.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Treatment options for Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) after failure of first-line chemotherapy are limited. This study (ORIENT-3) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab versus docetaxel as second-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC.<br />Methods: ORIENT-3 was an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled phase 3 trial that recruited patients with stage IIIB/IIIC/IV sqNSCLC after failure with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 200 mg of sintilimab or 75 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> of docetaxel intravenously every 3 weeks, stratified by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the full analysis set (FAS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR) and safety.<br />Results: Between August 25, 2017, and November 7, 2018, 290 patients were randomized. For FAS, 10 patients from the docetaxel arm were excluded. The median OS was 11.79 (n = 145; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.28-15.57) months with sintilimab versus 8.25 (n = 135; 95% CI, 6.47-9.82) months with docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.96; P = 0.025). Sintilimab treatment significantly prolonged PFS (median 4.30 vs. 2.79 months; HR: 0.52; 95% CI, 0.39-0.68; P < 0.001) and showed higher ORR (25.50% vs. 2.20%, P < 0.001) and DCR (65.50% vs. 37.80%, P < 0.001) than the docetaxel arm. The median DoR was 12.45 (95% CI, 4.86-25.33) months in the sintilimab arm and 4.14 (95% CI, 1.41-7.23) months in the docetaxel arm (P = 0.045). Treatment-related adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were reported in 26 (18.1%) patients in the sintilimab arm and 47 (36.2%) patients in the docetaxel arm. Exploratory biomarker analysis showed potential predictive values of expression levels of two transcription factors, including OVOL2 (HR: 0.35; P < 0.001) and CTCF (HR: 3.50; P < 0.001),for sintilimab treatment.<br />Conclusions: Compared with docetaxel, sintilimab significantly improved the OS, PFS, and ORR of Chinese patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC.<br /> (© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Communications published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. on behalf of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2523-3548
Volume :
42
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cancer communications (London, England)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36336841
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12385