Back to Search Start Over

Final 5-Year Report of the Randomized BIO-RESORT Trial Comparing 3 Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in All-Comers.

Authors :
Ploumen EH
Pinxterhuis TH
Buiten RA
Zocca P
Danse PW
Schotborgh CE
Scholte M
Gin RMTJ
Somi S
van Houwelingen KG
Stoel MG
de Man HAF
Hartmann M
Linssen GCM
van der Heijden LC
Kok MM
Doggen CJM
von Birgelen C
Source :
Journal of the American Heart Association [J Am Heart Assoc] 2022 Nov 15; Vol. 11 (22), pp. e026041. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Nov 08.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background In a previous trial, higher 5-year mortality was observed following treatment with biodegradable polymer Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). We assessed 5-year safety and efficacy of all-comers as well as patients with diabetes treated with SES or Synergy everolimus-eluting stents (EES) versus durable polymer Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES). Methods and Results The randomized BIO-RESORT (Comparison of Biodegradable Polymer and Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents in an All Comers Population) trial enrolled 3514 all-comer patients at 4 Dutch cardiac centers. Patients aged ≥18 years who required percutaneous coronary intervention were eligible. Participants were stratified for diabetes and randomized to treatment with SES, EES, or ZES (1:1:1). The main end point was target vessel failure (cardiac mortality, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Five-year follow-up was available in 3183 of 3514 (90.6%) patients. The main end point target vessel failure occurred in 142 of 1169 (12.7%) patients treated with SES, 130 of 1172 (11.6%) treated with EES, versus 157 of 1173 (14.1%) treated with ZES (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.71-1.12], P <subscript>log-rank</subscript> =0.31; and HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.65-1.04], P <subscript>log-rank</subscript> =0.10, respectively). Individual components of target vessel failure showed no significant between-stent difference. Very late definite stent thrombosis rates were low and similar (SES, 1.1%; EES, 0.6%; ZES, 0.9%). In patients with diabetes, target vessel failure did not differ significantly between stent-groups (SES, 19.8%; EES, 19.2%; versus ZES, 21.1% [ P <subscript>log-rank</subscript> =0.69 and P <subscript>log-rank</subscript> =0.63]). Conclusions Orsiro SES, Synergy EES, and Resolute Integrity ZES showed similar 5-year outcomes of safety and efficacy, including mortality. A prespecified stent comparison in patients with diabetes also revealed no significant differences in 5-year clinical outcomes. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01674803.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2047-9980
Volume :
11
Issue :
22
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of the American Heart Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36346050
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.026041