Back to Search
Start Over
Characteristics of Oral Corticosteroid Users Among Persons with Asthma on GINA Step 3 Therapy and Above: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portuguese Community Pharmacies.
- Source :
-
Journal of asthma and allergy [J Asthma Allergy] 2022 Nov 09; Vol. 15, pp. 1579-1592. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Nov 09 (Print Publication: 2022). - Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- Purpose: Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are frequently used in asthma management but have an important risk-profile. The aim of the study is to characterize and compare the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, treatment regimen and asthma control between OCS users and non-users among the population of asthma patients (≥18 years) at GINA step 3 and above treated with a fixed combination of an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA).<br />Methods: Cross-sectional study in Portuguese community pharmacies. Data was collected via paper-based interview delivered at the pharmacy (sociodemographic characteristics and asthma treatment regimen, namely ICS/LABA and OCS utilization), followed by a telephonic interview collecting smoking history, comorbidities, body mass index (BMI), history of exacerbations and asthma-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in the previous 12 months, as well as asthma control using the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT®).<br />Results: A total of 347 patients recruited in 98 pharmacies were included in the analysis. Of those, 328 had completed both questionnaires. A quarter of the individuals reported OCS use in the previous 12 months (OCS users), either as add-on therapy (6%) or exacerbation treatment (19%). Patients were mostly females (72%), with an average age of 59.5 years (SD=15.4). OCS users were significantly older and reported more frequently having conjunctivitis (25.9% vs 15.0%), osteoporosis (25.9% vs 13.4%), arthritis (14.6% vs 6.9%), and gastrointestinal disease (16.1% vs 8.1%). OCS users also reported greater urgent HCRU: unscheduled consultations (33.3% vs 9.3%) and emergency department (ED) visits (32.1% vs 12.1%). Both groups presented poor disease control (85.2% of OCS users vs 72.9% of non-OCS users).<br />Conclusion: These results highlight the burden of OCS therapy to asthma patients and the need to improve asthma management, by adopting OCS sparing strategies in this subgroup of patients.<br />Competing Interests: MR, CB, MP, ATR, and ZM report no conflicts of interest in this work. CS, GS and FB are employees of AstraZeneca. JAF reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Viatris, and GSK; grants and personal fees from Novartis and from Mundipharma, outside the submitted work and is co-founder of MEDIDA, Lda that provided project management services for the study. JCS reports Advisory Board from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees and Advisory Board from GSK, grants, personal fees and Advisory Board from AstraZeneca, personal fees and Advisory Board from Bial, non-financial support from Mundipharma, personal fees from Sanofi, Advisory Board from Novartis, outside the submitted work.<br /> (© 2022 Romão et al.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1178-6965
- Volume :
- 15
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of asthma and allergy
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 36387837
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S377896