Percutaneous coronary intervention of native coronary artery versus saphenous vein graft in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Rationale and design of the multicenter, randomized PROCTOR trial.

MLA

de Winter, Ruben W., et al. “Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Coronary Artery versus Saphenous Vein Graft in Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Rationale and Design of the Multicenter, Randomized PROCTOR Trial.” American Heart Journal, vol. 257, Mar. 2023, pp. 20–29. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2022.11.014.

APA

de Winter, R. W., Walsh, S. J., Hanratty, C. G., Spratt, J. C., Sprengers, R. W., Twisk, J. W. R., Vegting, I., Schumacher, S. P., Bom, M. J., Hoek, R., Verouden, N. J., Delewi, R., Nap, A., & Knaapen, P. (2023). Percutaneous coronary intervention of native coronary artery versus saphenous vein graft in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Rationale and design of the multicenter, randomized PROCTOR trial. American Heart Journal, 257, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2022.11.014

Chicago

de Winter, Ruben W, Simon J Walsh, Colm G Hanratty, James C Spratt, Ralf W Sprengers, Jos W R Twisk, Iris Vegting, et al. 2023. “Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Coronary Artery versus Saphenous Vein Graft in Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Rationale and Design of the Multicenter, Randomized PROCTOR Trial.” American Heart Journal 257 (March): 20–29. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2022.11.014.