Back to Search Start Over

Current testing programs for pesticides adequately capture endocrine activity and adversity for protection of vertebrate wildlife.

Authors :
Staveley JP
Freeman EL
McArdle ME
Ortego LS
Coady KK
Bone A
Lagadic L
Weltje L
Weyers A
Wheeler JR
Source :
Integrated environmental assessment and management [Integr Environ Assess Manag] 2023 Jul; Vol. 19 (4), pp. 1089-1109. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jan 27.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

The toxicity and ecotoxicity of pesticide active ingredients are evaluated by a number of standardized test methods using vertebrate animals. These standard test methods are required under various regulatory programs for the registration of pesticides. Over the past two decades, additional test methods have been developed with endpoints that are responsive to endocrine activity and subsequent adverse effects. This article examines the available test methods and their endpoints that are relevant to an assessment of endocrine-disrupting properties of pesticides. Furthermore, the article highlights how weight-of-evidence approaches should be applied to determine whether an adverse response in (eco)toxicity tests is caused by an endocrine mechanism of action. The large number of endpoints in the current testing paradigms for pesticides make it unlikely that endocrine activity and adversity is being overlooked. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2023;19:1089-1109. © 2023 Bayer CropScience and The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).<br /> (© 2023 Bayer CropScience and The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1551-3793
Volume :
19
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Integrated environmental assessment and management
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36597818
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4732