Back to Search Start Over

Early Invasive Strategy Based on the Time of Symptom Onset of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors :
Bae S
Cha JJ
Lim S
Kim JH
Joo HJ
Park JH
Hong SJ
Yu CW
Lim DS
Kim Y
Kang WC
Cho EJ
Lee SY
Kim SW
Shin ES
Hur SH
Oh SK
Lim SH
Kim HS
Hong YJ
Ahn Y
Jeong MH
Ahn TH
Source :
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions [JACC Cardiovasc Interv] 2023 Jan 09; Vol. 16 (1), pp. 64-75.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: A limitation of the current guidelines regarding the timing of invasive coronary angiography for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome is the randomization time. To date, no study has reported the clinical outcomes of invasive strategy timing on the basis of the time of symptom onset.<br />Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of invasive strategy timing from the time of symptom onset on the 3-year clinical outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).<br />Methods: Among 13,104 patients from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health, 5,856 patients with NSTE myocardial infarction were evaluated. The patients were categorized according to symptom-to-catheter (StC) time (<48 or ≥48 hours). The primary outcome was 3-year all-cause mortality.<br />Results: Overall, 3,919 patients (66.9%) were classified into the StC time <48 hours group. This group had lower all-cause mortality than the group with StC time ≥48 hours (7.3% vs 13.4%; P < 0.001). The lower risk for all-cause mortality in the group with StC time <48 hours group was consistent in all subgroups. Notably, emergency medical service use (HR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.19-0.52) showed a lower risk for all-cause mortality than no emergency medical service use (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.46-0.65; P value for interaction = 0.008).<br />Conclusions: An early invasive strategy on the basis of StC time was associated with a decreased risk for all-cause mortality in patients with NSTEMI. Because the study was based on a prospective registry, the results should be considered hypothesis generating, highlighting the need for further research. (iCReaT Study No. C110016).<br />Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1876-7605
Volume :
16
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36599589
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2022.09.039