[Profiles and differences of submucosal microbial in peri-implantitis and health implants: A cross-sectional study].

Objective: To describe the submucosal microbial profiles of peri-implantitis and healthy implants, and to explore bacteria that might be correlated with clinical parameters.
Methods: In the present cross-sectional study, 49 patients were recruited. Each patient contributed with one implant, submucosal biofilms were collected from 20 healthy implants and 29 implants with peri-implantitis. DNA was extracted and bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) genes were amplified. Submucosal biofilms were analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing at Illumina MiSeq platform. Differences between the groups were determined by analyzing α diversity, microbial component and microbial structure. The potential correlation between the bacteria with pocket probing depth (PPD) of peri-implant calculated by Spearman correlation analysis.
Results: The α diversity of submucosal microbial of health group was significantly lower than that in peri-implantitis group (Chao1 index: 236.85±66.13 vs. 150.54±57.43, P < 0.001; Shannon index: 3.42±0.48 vs . 3.02±0.65, P =0.032). Principal coordinated analysis showed that the submucosal microbial structure had significant difference between healthy and peri-implantitis groups [ R ² =0.243, P =0.001, analysis of similarities (ANOSIM)]. Compared with healthy implants, relative abundance of periodontal pathogens were higher in peri-implantitis, including members of the red complex ( Porphyromonas gingivalis , Tannerella forsythia , Treponema denticola ) and some members of orange complex ( Precotella intermedia , Eubacterium nodatum , Parvimonas micra ), as well as some new periodontal pathogens, such as Fillifactor alocis , Fretibacterium fastidiosum , Desulfobulbus sp.&#95;HMT&#95;041 , and Porphyromonas endodontalis. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that the relative abundance of Treponema denticola ( r =0.686, P < 0.001), Tannerella forsythia ( r =0.675, P < 0.001), Fretibacterium sp. ( r =0.671, P < 0.001), Desulfobulbus sp.&#95;HMT&#95;041 ( r =0.664, P < 0.001), Filifactor alocis ( r =0.642, P < 0.001), Fretibacterium fastidiosum ( r =0.604, P < 0.001), Porphyromonas gingivalis ( r =0.597, P < 0.001), Porphyromonas endodontalis ( r =0.573, P < 0.001) were positive correlated with PPD. While the relative abundance of Rothia aeria ( r =-0.615, P < 0.001) showed negatively correlation with PPD.
Conclusion: Marked differences were observed in the microbial profiles of healthy implants and peri-implantitis. The members of red and orange complex as well as some new periodontal pathogens seem to play an important role in peri-implant disease. Compared with healthy implants, the submucosal microbial of peri-implantitis were characterized by high species richness and diversity.