Cite
Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy Between Forsus and Advansync Fixed Functional Appliance for the Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Using 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT): A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.
MLA
M, Hemanth, et al. “Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy Between Forsus and Advansync Fixed Functional Appliance for the Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Using 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT): A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.” Cureus, vol. 15, no. 1, Jan. 2023, p. e33399. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33399.
APA
M, H., Shadani, K., M, A., W, A. S., Mp, S., P, P., & Daksha, S. (2023). Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy Between Forsus and Advansync Fixed Functional Appliance for the Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Using 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT): A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Cureus, 15(1), e33399. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33399
Chicago
M, Hemanth, Kiran Shadani, Aravind M, Afshan S W, Suchitra Mp, Prajwal P, and Shantanu Daksha. 2023. “Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy Between Forsus and Advansync Fixed Functional Appliance for the Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Using 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT): A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.” Cureus 15 (1): e33399. doi:10.7759/cureus.33399.