Back to Search Start Over

Slice positioning in phase-contrast MRI impacts aortic stenosis assessment.

Authors :
Troger F
Tiller C
Reindl M
Lechner I
Holzknecht M
Pamminger M
Poskaite P
Kremser C
Ulmer H
Gizewski ER
Bauer A
Reinstadler S
Metzler B
Klug G
Mayr A
Source :
European journal of radiology [Eur J Radiol] 2023 Apr; Vol. 161, pp. 110722. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Feb 01.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Aims: To determine the phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (PC-CMR) slice-position above aortic leaflet-attachment-plane (LAP) that provides flow-velocity, -volume and aortic valve area (AVA) measurements with best agreement to invasive and echocardiographic measurements in aortic stenosis (AS).<br />Methods and Results: Fifty-five patients with moderate/severe AS underwent cardiac catheterization, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and CMR. Overall, 171 image-planes parallel to LAP were measured via PC-CMR between 22 mm below and 24 mm above LAP. AVA via PC-CMR was calculated as flow-volume divided by peak-velocity during systole. Stroke volume (SV) and AVA were compared to volumetric SV and invasive AVA via the Gorlin-formula, respectively. Above LAP, SV by PC-CMR showed no significant dependence on image-plane-position and correlated strongly with volumetry (rho: 0.633, p < 0.001, marginal-mean-difference (MMD): 1 ml, 95 % confidence-interval (CI): -4 to 6). AVA assessed in image-planes 0-10 mm above LAP differed significantly from invasive measurement (MMD: -0.14 cm <superscript>2</superscript> , 95 %CI: 0.08-0.21). In contrast, AVA-values by PC-CMR measured 10-20 mm above LAP showed good agreement with invasive determination without significant MMD (0.003 cm <superscript>2</superscript> , 95 %CI: -0.09 to 0.09). Within these measurements, a plane 15 mm above LAP resulted in the lowest bias (MMD: 0.02 cm <superscript>2</superscript> , 95 %CI:-0.29 to 0.33). SV and AVA via TTE correlated moderately with volumetry (rho: 0.461, p < 0.001; bias: 15 ml, p < 0.001) and cardiac catheterization (rho: 0.486, p < 0.001, bias: -0.13 cm <superscript>2</superscript> , p < 0.001), respectively.<br />Conclusion: PC-CMR measurements at 0-10 mm above LAP should be avoided due to significant AVA-overestimation compared to invasive determination. AVA-assessment by PC-CMR between 10 and 20 mm above LAP did not differ from invasive measurements, with the lowest intermethodical bias measured 15 mm above LAP.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.<br /> (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1872-7727
Volume :
161
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36758278
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110722