Categorization of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using disease activity, patient-reported outcomes, and transcriptomic signatures.

Objective: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) display symptoms that are not always related to disease activity and may distort clinical trial results. Recently, a clinical categorization based on the presence of type 1 (inflammatory manifestations) and/or type 2 (widespread pain, fatigue, depression) symptoms has been proposed in SLE. Our aim was to develop a type 2 score derived from the Short-Form health survey (SF-36) to categorize SLE patients and to compare immunological and transcriptomic profiles between groups.
Method: Seventeen items from the SF-36 were selected to build a type 2 score for 50 SLE patients (100 visits; LUPUCE cohort), and the SLEDAI was used to define type 1 symptoms. Patients were categorized into four groups: minimal (no symptoms), type 1, type 2, and mixed (both type 1 and type 2 symptoms). Clinical, immunological, and transcriptomic profiles were compared between the groups.
Results: Type 2 scores ranged from 0 to 31, with a cutoff value of 14 (75th percentile). The sample categorization was minimal in 39%, type 1 in 37%, and type 2 in 9%, and mixed in 15%. Type 2 patients were older than minimal patients and had a longer disease duration than type 1 and mixed patients. Immunological data and modular interferon signatures did not differ between the groups.
Conclusion: Patients with SLE can be categorized into four clinical groups using the SLEDAI score and our SF-36-derived type 2 score. This categorization is non-redundant with immunological or transcriptomic profiles and could prove useful to stratify patients in clinical trials. Key Points • A score derived from selected items of the SF-36 can be used to identify SLE patients with type 2 symptoms according to the Duke University categorization. • Using the SLEDAI and this type 2 score, SLE patients can be categorized into four clinical groups. • This categorization is not related to immunological activity or blood transcriptome profiles (and not to the interferon signature in particular). • This categorization could be useful in the daily care of patients as well as in clinical trials, for upstream patient stratification or for the interpretation of results.
(© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).)