[Mucins expression in gastric cancer: connection of MUC status with clinical, morphological and prognostic characteristics of the tumor].

Objective: Clarification of the prognostic value and relationship of MUC-phenotypes of gastric cancer with clinical and morphological parameters.
Material and Methods: Surgical material from 310 patients with a verified diagnosis of gastric cancer was studied. Samples were immunohistochemically stained with antibodies to MUC2, CD10, MUC5AC. The results were compared with clinical and morphological characteristics of gastric cancer and patient survival data.
Results: The MUC-null and MUC-mix groups significantly differ in the prevalence of subtotal/total tumors from the MUC-I group ( p =0.022 and p =0.007, respectively), where there are significantly fewer such tumors. Tubular tumors were more common in the MUC-null group compared to the MUC-G ( p =0.026) and MUC-mix ( p =0.006) groups, and there were fewer cases with the presence of "signet-ring" cells in the MUC-null group ( p =0.000). When studying the discohesive histological type, the literature data on smaller tumor sizes and a lower frequency of lymph node metastasis for MUC-G status were not confirmed, but a more frequent proximal localization of MUC-I tumors was found ( p =0.003). No statistically significant differences in survival were found in the analysis of the total sample. Differences in survival were found only in discohesive cancers, where the best survival was recorded for the MUC-null group, and the worst for the MUC-mix group ( p =0.022). MUC status is not an independent predictor of gastric cancer (HR=1.662, p =0.093).
Conclusion: Between tumors with different MUC statuses, there were differences in localization and belonging to individual histological types. Significant differences in survival were found only for discohesive cancers with MUC-null and MUC-mix statuses. Separation of gastric cancers according to MUC status may have only limited predictive value in selected histological forms of cancer.