Back to Search Start Over

High prevalence of incidental endoscopic findings at routine endoscopy after atrial fibrillation ablation: Do we need a screening endoscopy for the upper gastrointestinal tract in the general population?

Authors :
Meinhardt C
List S
Chamieh AE
Fehrendt H
Meves V
Mohamed M
Müller J
Deneke T
Geismann C
Elsässer A
Arlt A
Halbfass P
Source :
European journal of internal medicine [Eur J Intern Med] 2023 May; Vol. 111, pp. 54-62. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Feb 14.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Introduction: High-power short-duration ablation (HPSD) is an effective therapy for atrial fibrillation with thermal esophageal injury as a rare but relevant side effect.<br />Aim and Methods: In this retrospective single-center analysis we evaluated the incidence and relevance of ablation-induced findings and the prevalence of ablation-independent incidental gastrointestinal findings. For 15 months all patients undergoing ablation were screened by postablation esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Pathological findings were followed up and treated if necessary.<br />Results: 286 consecutive patients (66±10 years; 54.9% male) were included. 19.6% of patients showed ablation-associated alterations (10.8% esophageal lesions, 10.8% gastroparesis, 1.7% both findings). Logistic multivariable regression analysis confirmed an influence of lower BMI on the occurrence of RFA-associated endoscopic findings (OR 0.936, 95% CI 0.878-0.997, p<0.05). 48.3% of patients demonstrated incidental gastrointestinal findings. In 1.0% neoplastic lesions were present, 9.4% showed precancerous lesions and in 4.2% neoplastic lesions of unknown dignity were found requiring further diagnostics or therapy. 18.1% of patients demonstrated findings associated with a potentially increased risk of bleeding under anticoagulation. Patients with clinically relevant incidental findings were significantly more often male, 68.8% vs. 49.5% (p<0.01).<br />Conclusion: HPSD ablation is safe, no devasting complication occurred in any patient. It resulted in 19.6% ablation-induced thermal injury whereas incidental findings of the upper GI tract were found in 48.3% of patients. Due to the high prevalence of 14.7% of findings requiring further diagnostics, therapy, or surveillance in a cohort that is mimicking the general population, screening endoscopy of the upper GI tract seems to be reasonable in the general population.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None to declare.<br /> (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-0828
Volume :
111
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of internal medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36797118
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2023.02.011