Direct inhibition of bisphenols on human and rat 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2: Structure-activity relationship and docking analysis.

Bisphenols (BPs) as endocrine-disrupting compounds have drawn attention to their health hazards. Whether a BP interferes with glucocorticoid metabolism remains unclear. 11β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2 (11β-HSD2) is a key glucocorticoid-metabolizing enzyme that controls fetal glucocorticoid levels across the placental barrier and mineralocorticoid receptor specificity in the kidney. In this study, 11 BPs were tested to inhibit human placental and rat renal 11β-HSD2 and were analyzed for inhibitory potency, mode action, and docking parameters. BPs had inhibitory potency against human 11β-HSD2: BPFL>BPAP>BPZ>BPB>BPC>BPAF>BPA>TDP and the IC ₁₀ values were 0.21, 0.55, 1.04, 2.04, 2.43, 2.57, 14.43, and 22.18 μM, respectively. All BPs are mixed inhibitors except BPAP, which is a competitive inhibitor for human 11β-HSD2. Some BPs also inhibited rat renal 11β-HSD2, with BPB (IC ₅₀ , 27.74 ± 0.95) > BPZ (42.14 ± 0.59) > BPAF (54.87 ± 1.73) > BPA (77.32 ± 1.20) > other BPs (about 100 μM). Docking analysis showed that all BPs bound to the steroid-binding site, interacting with the catalytic residue Tyr232 of both enzymes and the most potent human 11β-HSD2 inhibitor BPFL acts possibly due to its large fluorene ring that has hydrophobic interaction with residues Glu172 and Val270 and π-stacking interaction with catalytic residue Tyr232. The increase in the size of substituted alkanes and halogenated groups in the methane moiety of the bridge of BPs increases its inhibitory potency. Regressions of the lowest binding energy with inhibition constant indicated that there was an inverse regression. These results indicated that BPs significantly inhibited human and rat 11β-HSD2 activity and that there were species-dependent differences.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)