Concurrent validity and reliability of suicide risk assessment instruments: A meta-analysis of 20 instruments across 27 international cohorts.

MLA

Campos, Adrian I., et al. “Concurrent Validity and Reliability of Suicide Risk Assessment Instruments: A Meta-Analysis of 20 Instruments across 27 International Cohorts.” Neuropsychology, vol. 37, no. 3, Mar. 2023, pp. 315–29. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000850.

APA

Campos, A. I., Van Velzen, L. S., Veltman, D. J., Pozzi, E., Ambrogi, S., Ballard, E. D., Banaj, N., Başgöze, Z., Bellow, S., Benedetti, F., Bollettini, I., Brosch, K., Canales-Rodríguez, E. J., Clarke-Rubright, E. K., Colic, L., Connolly, C. G., Courtet, P., Cullen, K. R., Dannlowski, U., … Rentería, M. E. (2023). Concurrent validity and reliability of suicide risk assessment instruments: A meta-analysis of 20 instruments across 27 international cohorts. Neuropsychology, 37(3), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000850

Chicago

Campos, Adrian I, Laura S Van Velzen, Dick J Veltman, Elena Pozzi, Sonia Ambrogi, Elizabeth D Ballard, Nerisa Banaj, et al. 2023. “Concurrent Validity and Reliability of Suicide Risk Assessment Instruments: A Meta-Analysis of 20 Instruments across 27 International Cohorts.” Neuropsychology 37 (3): 315–29. doi:10.1037/neu0000850.