Back to Search Start Over

Validation of the Nine-Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen Among Transgender and Nonbinary Youth and Young Adults.

Authors :
Zickgraf HF
Garwood SK
Lewis CB
Giedinghagen AM
Reed JL
Linsenmeyer WR
Source :
Transgender health [Transgend Health] 2023 Mar 31; Vol. 8 (2), pp. 159-167. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Mar 31 (Print Publication: 2023).
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to provide initial evidence for the internal consistency and convergent validity of the nine-item avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder screen (NIAS) in a sample of transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) youth and young adults.<br />Methods: Returning patients at a Midwestern gender clinic ( n =164) ages 12-23 completed the NIAS, sick, control, one stone, fat, food (SCOFF), patient health questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), and generalized anxiety disorder 7 (GAD-7) during their clinic visit. Age, sex assigned at birth, gender identity, weight, and height were also collected. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to establish the hypothesized three-factor structure of the NIAS in this sample. Relationships between the NIAS subscales and anthropometric data, SCOFF, PHQ-9, GAD-7, and sex assigned at birth were explored for convergent and divergent validity, and proposed screening cutoff scores were used to identify the prevalence of likely avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in this population.<br />Results: The three-factor structure of the NIAS was an excellent fit to the current data. Approximately one in five (22%) of the participants screened positive for ARFID. Approximately one in four participants scored above the picky eating (27.4%) or appetite (23.9%) cutoffs. Assigned female at birth participants scored significantly higher on the NIAS-Total, Appetite, and Fear subscales than those assigned male at birth. NIAS-Total was significantly related to all convergent validity variables other than age, with a moderate-strong correlation with other symptom screeners (SCOFF, PHQ-9, GAD-7), and a small negative correlation with body mass index percentile.<br />Conclusions: Evidence supports the NIAS as a valid measure to screen for ARFID among TGNB youth and young adults.<br />Competing Interests: No competing financial interests exist.<br /> (Copyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2688-4887
Volume :
8
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Transgender health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37013088
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2021.0021