Back to Search Start Over

Patients with higher-atherothrombotic risk vs. lower-atherothrombotic risk undergoing coronary intervention with newer-generation drug-eluting stents: an analysis from the randomized BIOFLOW trials.

Authors :
Hemetsberger R
Mankerious N
Toelg R
Abdelghani M
Farhan S
Garcia-Garica HM
Allali A
Windecker S
Lefèvre T
Saito S
Kandzari D
Waksman R
Richardt G
Source :
Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society [Clin Res Cardiol] 2023 Sep; Vol. 112 (9), pp. 1278-1287. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Apr 16.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Patients with atherothrombotic risk are at high hazard of ischemic events. Preventive medicine plays a major role in modifying their outcomes. Whether the choice of a BP-SES or DP-EES can contribute to the occurrence of events remains unclear. We sought to investigate the outcomes of patients with higher atherothrombotic risk (H-ATR) versus lower atherothrombotic risk (L-ATR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with either bioresorbable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) or durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent (DP-EES).<br />Methods: Patients (n = 2361) from BIOFLOW-II, -IV, and -V randomized trials were categorized into H-ATR vs. L-ATR. L-ATR patients had ≤ 1 and H-ATR ≥ 2 of the following criteria: presentation in ACS, diabetes mellitus, previous myocardial infarction, previous PCI/CABG, or previous stroke. Endpoints were target lesion failure (TLF: cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction [TV-MI], target lesion revascularization [TLR]) and stent thrombosis (ST) at three years.<br />Results: H-ATR patients (n = 1023) were more morbid than L-ATR patients (n = 1338). TLF rate was significantly higher in H-ATR patients as compared with L-ATR (11.6% vs. 7.0%; HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.27-2.20, p < 0.0001). With BP-SES TLF rates were numerically lower as compared with DP-EES in H-ATR (10.5% vs. 13.5%; HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.54-1.14, p = 0.20) and significantly lower in L-ATR (5.6% vs. 9.8%; HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.85, p = 0.006).<br />Conclusion: In the era of newer-generation DES, patients with H-ATR still are at hazard for ischemic events. Patients with BP-SES had lower TLF rates as compared with DP-EES, most consistent in L-ATR whereas in H-ATR patients most probably secondary preventive strategies are of higher value.<br />Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrial.gov. NCT01356888, NCT01939249, NCT02389946. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01356888 , https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01939249 , https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02389946 .<br /> (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1861-0692
Volume :
112
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37062047
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02205-4