Back to Search Start Over

The charlotte large artery occlusion endovascular therapy outcome score compares favorably to the critical area perfusion score for prognostication before basilar thrombectomy.

Authors :
Karamchandani RR
Satyanarayana S
Yang H
Rhoten JB
Strong D
Singh S
Clemente JD
Defilipp G
Hazim M
Patel NM
Bernard J
Stetler WR
Parish JM
Blackwell TA
Heit JJ
Albers GW
Saba K
Guzik AK
Wolfe SQ
Asimos AW
Source :
Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association [J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis] 2023 Jul; Vol. 32 (7), pp. 107147. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Apr 28.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Introduction: The Critical Area Perfusion Score (CAPS) predicts functional outcomes in vertebrobasilar thrombectomy patients based on computed tomography perfusion (CTP) hypoperfusion. We compared CAPS to the clinical-radiographic Charlotte Large artery occlusion Endovascular therapy Outcome Score (CLEOS).<br />Methods: Acute basilar thrombosis patients from January 2017-December 2021 were included in this retrospective analysis from a health system's stroke registry. Inter-rater reliability was assessed for 6 CAPS raters. A logistic regression with CAPS and CLEOS as predictors was performed to predict 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 4-6. Area under the curve (AUC) analyses were performed to evaluate prognostic ability.<br />Results: 55 patients, mean age 65.8 (± 13.1) years and median NIHSS score 15.5 <superscript>5-24</superscript> , were included. Light's kappa among 6 raters for favorable versus unfavorable CAPS was 0.633 (95% CI 0.497-0.785). Increased CLEOS was associated with elevated odds of a poor outcome (odds ratio (OR) 1.0010, 95% CI 1.0007-1.0014, p<0.01), though CAPS was not (OR 1.0028, 95% CI 0.9420-1.0676, p=0.93). An overall favorable trend was observed for CLEOS (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.54-0.84) versus CAPS (AUC 0.49, 95% CI 0.34-0.64; p=0.051). Among 85.5% of patients with endovascular reperfusion, CLEOS had a statistically higher sensitivity than CAPS at identifying poor 90-day outcomes (71% versus 21%, p=0.003).<br />Conclusions: CLEOS demonstrated better predictive ability than CAPS for poor outcomes overall and in patients achieving reperfusion after basilar thrombectomy.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Joe Bernard declares stock/stock options from Viz.Ai and personal fees from Stryker, Terumo, and Rapid AI. Dr. Jeremy Heit is a consultant for Medtronic and MicroVention and a member of the Scientific and Advisory Board for iSchemaView. Dr. Gregory Albers is a consultant for Genentech, iSchemaView, and Biogen and has equity interest in iSchemaView. All other authors report no disclosures.<br /> (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-8511
Volume :
32
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37119791
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107147