Back to Search Start Over

Association of beta-blockers beyond 1 year after myocardial infarction and cardiovascular outcomes.

Authors :
Ishak D
Aktaa S
Lindhagen L
Alfredsson J
Dondo TB
Held C
Jernberg T
Yndigegn T
Gale CP
Batra G
Source :
Heart (British Cardiac Society) [Heart] 2023 Jul 12; Vol. 109 (15), pp. 1159-1165. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jul 12.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Objective: Beta-blockers (BB) are an established treatment following myocardial infarction (MI). However, there is uncertainty as to whether BB beyond the first year of MI have a role in patients without heart failure or left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).<br />Methods: A nationwide cohort study was conducted including 43 618 patients with MI between 2005 and 2016 in the Swedish register for coronary heart disease. Follow-up started 1 year after hospitalisation (index date). Patients with heart failure or LVSD up until the index date were excluded. Patients were allocated into two groups according to BB treatment. Primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, MI, unscheduled revascularisation and hospitalisation for heart failure. Outcomes were analysed using Cox and Fine-Grey regression models after inverse propensity score weighting.<br />Results: Overall, 34 253 (78.5%) patients received BB and 9365 (21.5%) did not at the index date 1 year following MI. The median age was 64 years and 25.5% were female. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the unadjusted rate of primary outcome was lower among patients who received versus not received BB (3.8 vs 4.9 events/100 person-years) (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.73 to 1.04). Following inverse propensity score weighting and multivariable adjustment, the risk of the primary outcome was not different according to BB treatment (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.04). Similar findings were observed when censoring for BB discontinuation or treatment switch during follow-up.<br />Conclusion: Evidence from this nationwide cohort study suggests that BB treatment beyond 1 year of MI for patients without heart failure or LVSD was not associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: JA reports, outside the submitted work, honoraria for lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, MSD and Bayer; advisory board from AstraZeneca and Novartis. CH reports, outside the submitted work, institutional research grants from Pfizer, GlaxoSmith Kline, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb; advisory board from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk and Coala Life; personal fees from event adjudication for Uppsala Clinical Research Center. CPG reports, outside the submitted work, consultancy/advisory (AstraZeneca, AINexus, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chiesi, Daiichi Sankyo, GPRI Research B.V., iRhythm Menarini, Novartis, Organon), international advisory board member (BMJ Heart), speaker fees (AstraZeneca, Bayer, Menarini, Raisio Group, Wondr Medical, Zydus), editorship (Deputy Editor: European Heart Journal Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes, Oxford University Press), grants (British Heart Foundation, National Institute for Health Research, Horizon 2020, Abbott Diabetes, Bristol Myers Squibb), leadership (NICE Indicator Advisory Committee, Chair ESC Quality Indicator Committee). GB reports, outside the submitted work, institutional research grants from Pfizer; expert committee and consulting fees to his institution from Bayer; honoraria for lectures and scientific advice from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Sanofi.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1468-201X
Volume :
109
Issue :
15
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Heart (British Cardiac Society)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37130746
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2022-322115